1. Executive Summary
2. Market Definition and Scope
3. Market Opportunity
4. Competitive Benchmarking (Financial and Market)
5. Company Profile on Following Parameters
6. Profiles on Following Companies
6.1. Baker Hughes Inc
6.2. Halliburton
6.3. National Oilwell Varco Inc
6.4. Schlumberger Ltd
6.5. Weatherford International Ltd
List of Figures
CHAPTER 3. Market Opportunity
Figure 3.1: Supply chain for oil and gas well completion and production market
Figure 3.2: Global oil and gas well completion and production industry annual trend 2006-2011 (US $B)
Figure 3.3: Global oil and gas well completion and production industry regional trend 2006-2011 (US $B)
Figure 3.4: Global oil and gas well completion and production industry regional trend 2006-2011 (%)
Figure 3.5: Global oil and gas well completion and production industry opportunity by region
CHAPTER 4.Competitive Benchmarking (Financial and Market)
Figure 4.1: Top five oil and gas well completion and production companies – financial benchmarking
Figure 4.2: Global top five oil and gas well completion and production companies gross profit and net profit analysis – 2011
Figure 4.3: Financial analysis – growth leadership quadrant (2011)
Figure 4.4: Market share of top players 2006
Figure 4.5: Market share of top players 2011
Figure 4.6: 2006 Market share analysis
Figure 4.7: 2011 Market share analysis
Figure 4.8: Global market share analysis 2011
Figure 4.9: Global market fragmentation 2011
Figure 4.10: Market value North America (US $B)
Figure 4.11: Market value Europe: (US $B)
Figure 4.12: Market value Asia Pacific (US $B)
Figure 4.13: Market value ROW (US $B)
Figure 4.14: Regional revenue evaluation 2011(US $M)
Figure 4.15: Regional revenue evaluation 2011(%)
Figure 4.16: North American revenue trend for top players 2007-2011 (US $B)
Figure 4.17: Europe revenue trend for top players 2007-2011 (US $B)
Figure 4.18: Asia Pacific revenue trend for top players 2007-2011 (US $B)
Figure 4.19: Row revenue trend for top players 2007-2011 (US $B)
Figure 4.20: Lucintel triad - top five major players
CHAPTER 5. Company Profile of Baker Hughes Inc.
Figure 5.1: Baker Hughes Inc.’s revenue by business structure 2011
Figure 5.2: Lucintel Triad – Baker Hughes Inc.
Figure 5.3: Financial benchmarking Baker Hughes Inc. against top three and top five industry players’ average
Figure 5.4: Financial benchmarking of Baker Hughes Inc. against Top Five best
Figure 5.5: Global industry revenue trend Vs Baker Hughes Inc. (2007-2011) in US $B
Figure 5.6: Global market share trend for Baker Hughes Inc. (2007-2011) in (%)
Figure 5.7: North American industry revenue trend Vs Baker Hughes Inc. 2007-2011 in (US $B)
Figure 5.8: European industry revenue trend Vs Baker Hughes Inc. 2007-2011 in (US $B)
Figure 5.9: APAC industry revenue trend Vs Baker Hughes Inc. 2007-2011 in (US $B)
Figure 5.10: ROW industry revenue trend Vs Baker Hughes Inc. 2007-2011 in (US $B)
Figure 5.11: North American market share trend Vs Baker Hughes Inc. 2007-2011 in (%)
Figure 5.12: European market share trend Vs Baker Hughes Inc. 2007-2011 in (%)
Figure 5.13: APAC market share trend Vs Baker Hughes Inc. 2007-2011 in (%)
Figure 5.14: ROW market share trend Vs Baker Hughes Inc. 2007-2011 in (%)
Figure 5.15: Baker Hughes Inc. trend in R&D expenses 2007-2011 in US $B
Figure 5.16: Baker Hughes Inc. trend in R&D expenses Percentage of total revenue
Figure 5.17: Comparison of Baker Hughes Inc. SE R&D expenditure Vs top three & top five players average 2011
Figure 5.18: Baker Hughes Inc. productivity 2007-2011 (US $M)
Figure 5.19: Baker Hughes Inc. fixed asset value 2007-2011 (US $M)
Figure 5.20: Strategic execution
CHAPTER 6. Company Profile of Halliburton
Figure 6.1: Halliburton revenue by business structure 2011
Figure 6.2: Lucintel triad - Halliburton
Figure 6.3: Financial benchmarking of Halliburton against top three and top five industry players’ average
Figure 6.4: Financial benchmarking of Halliburton against Top five best
Figure 6.5: Global industry revenue trend Vs Halliburton (2007-2011) in (US $B)
Figure 6.6: Global market share trend for Halliburton (2007-2011) in (%)
Figure 6.7: North American industry revenue trend Vs. Halliburton 2007-2011 in (US $B)
Figure 6.8: European industry revenue trend Vs Halliburton 2007-2011 in (US $B)
Figure 6.9: APAC industry revenue trend Vs Halliburton 2007-2011 in (US $B)
Figure 6.10: ROW industry revenue trend Vs Halliburton 2007-2011 in (US $B)
Figure 6.11: North American market share trend Vs Halliburton 2007-2011 in (%)
Figure 6.12: European market share trend Vs Halliburton 2007-2011 in (%)
Figure 6.13: APAC market share trend Vs DuPont 2007-2011 in (%)
Figure 6.14: ROW market share trend Vs DuPont 2007-2011 in (%)
Figure 6.15: Halliburton trend in R&D expenses 2007-2011 in US $M
Figure 6.16: Halliburton trend in R&D expenses Percentage of total revenue
Figure 6.17: Comparison of Halliburton SE R&D expenditure Vs top three & top five players average 2011
Figure 6.18: Halliburton productivity: 2007-2011 in (US $M)
Figure 6.19: Halliburton fixed asset value: 2007-2011 in (US $B)
Figure 6.20: Strategic execution
CHAPTER 7. Company Profile of National Oilwell Varco Inc.
Figure 7.1: National Oilwell Varco Inc. revenue by business structure 2011
Figure 7.2: Lucintel triad – National Oilwell Varco Inc.
Figure 7.3: Financial benchmarking of National Oilwell Varco Inc. against top three and top five industry players’ average
Figure 7.4: Financial benchmarking of National Oilwell Varco Inc. against Top five best
Figure 7.5: Global industry revenue trend Vs National Oilwell Varco Inc. (2007-2011) in (US $B)
Figure 7.6: Global market share trend for National Oilwell Varco Inc. (2007-2011) in (%)
Figure 7.7: North American industry revenue trend Vs National Oilwell Varco Inc. (2007-2011) in (US $B)
Figure 7.8: European industry revenue trend Vs National Oilwell Varco Inc. (2007-2011) in (US $B)
Figure 7.9: APAC industry revenue trend Vs National Oilwell Varco Inc. (2007-2011) in (US $B)
Figure 7.10: ROW industry revenue trend Vs National Oilwell Varco Inc. (2007-2011) in (US $B)
Figure 7.11: North American market share trend Vs National Oilwell Varco Inc. (2007-2011) in (%)
Figure 7.12: European market share trend Vs National Oilwell Varco Inc. l (2007-2011) in (%)
Figure 7.13: APAC market share trend Vs National Oilwell Varco Inc. (2007-2011) in (%)
Figure 7.14: ROW market share trend Vs National Oilwell Varco Inc. (2007-2011) in (%)
Figure 7.15: National Oilwell Varco Inc. trend in R&D expenses 2007-2011 in US $M
Figure 7.16: National Oilwell Varco Inc. trend in R&D expenses Percentage of total revenue
Figure 7.17: Comparison of National Oilwell Varco Inc. R&D expenditure Vs top three & top five players average 2011
Figure 7.18: National Oilwell Varco Inc. productivity: 2007-2011 in (US $M)
Figure 7.19: National Oilwell Varco Inc. fixed asset value: 2007-2011 in (US $M)
Figure 7.20: Strategic execution
CHAPTER 8. Company Profile of Schlumberger Ltd.
Figure 8.1: Schlumberger Ltd. revenue by business structure 2011
Figure 8.2: Lucintel triad – Schlumberger Ltd.
Figure 8.3: Financial benchmarking of Schlumberger Ltd. against top three and top five industry players’ average
Figure 8.4: Financial benchmarking of Schlumberger Ltd. against Top five best
Figure 8.5: Global industry revenue trend Vs Schlumberger Ltd. (2007-2011) in (US $B)
Figure 8.6: Global market share trend for Schlumberger Ltd. (2007-2011) in (%)
Figure 8.7: North American industry revenue trend Vs Schlumberger Ltd. (2007-2011) in (US $B)
Figure 8.8: European industry revenue trend Vs Schlumberger Ltd. (2007-2011) in (US $B)
Figure 8.9: APAC industry revenue trend Vs Schlumberger Ltd. (2007-2011) in (US $B)
Figure 8.10: ROW industry revenue trend Vs Schlumberger Ltd. (2007-2011) in (US $B)
Figure 8.11: North American market share trend Vs Schlumberger Ltd. (2007-2011) in (%)
Figure 8.12: European market share trend Vs Schlumberger Ltd. (2007-2011) in (%)
Figure 8.13: APAC market share trend Vs Schlumberger Ltd. (2007-2011) in (%)
Figure 8.14: ROW market share trend Vs Schlumberger Ltd. (2007-2011) in (%)
Figure 8.15: Schlumberger Ltd. trend in R&D expenses 2007-2011 in US $B
Figure 8.16: Schlumberger Ltd. trend in R&D expenses Percentage of total revenue
Figure 8.17: Comparison of Schlumberger Ltd. R&D expenditure vs top three & top five players average 2011
Figure 8.18: Schlumberger Ltd. productivity: 2007-2011 in (US $M)
Figure 8.19: Schlumberger Ltd. capital investment value: 2007-2011 in (US $M)
Figure 8.20: Strategic execution
CHAPTER 9. Company Profile of Weatherford International Ltd.
Figure 9.1: Weatherford International Ltd. revenue by business structure 2011
Figure 9.2: Lucintel triad – Weatherford International Ltd.
Figure 9.3: Financial benchmarking of Weatherford International Ltd. against top three and top five industry players’ average
Figure 9.4: Financial benchmarking of Weatherford International Ltd. against Top five best
Figure 9.5: Global industry revenue trend Vs Weatherford International Ltd.(2007-2011) in (US $B)
Figure 9.6: Global market share trend for Weatherford International Ltd.(2007-2011) in (%)
Figure 9.7: North American industry revenue trend Vs Weatherford International Ltd.(2007-2011) in (US $B)
Figure 9.8: European industry revenue trend Vs Weatherford International Ltd.(2007-2011) in (US $B)
Figure 9.9: APAC industry revenue trend Vs Weatherford International Ltd.(2007-2011) in (US $B)
Figure 9.10: ROW industry revenue trend Vs Weatherford International Ltd.(2007-2011) in (US $B)
Figure 9.11: North American market share trend Vs Weatherford International Ltd.(2007-2011) in (%)
Figure 9.12: European market share trend Vs Weatherford International Ltd.(2007-2011) in (%)
Figure 9.13: APAC market share trend Vs Weatherford International Ltd.(2007-2011) in (%)
Figure 9.14: ROW market share trend Vs Weatherford International Ltd.(2007-2011) in (%)
Figure 9.15: Weatherford International Ltd. trend in R&D expenses 2007-2011 in US $B
Figure 9.16: Weatherford International Ltd. trend in R&D expenses percentage of total revenue
Figure 9.17: Comparison of Weatherford International Ltd. R&D expenditure Vs top three & top five players average 2011
Figure 9.18: Weatherford International Ltd. productivity: 2007-2011 in (US $M)
Figure 9.19: Weatherford International Ltd. capital investment value: 2007-2011 in (US $M)
Figure 9.20: Strategic execution
List of Tables
CHAPTER 3. Market Opportunity
Table 3.1: Industry parameters of global oil and gas well completion and production industry
Table 3.2: Relative market attractiveness by region
Table 3.3: Regional revenue growth rate
Table 3.4: Segment revenue growth rate
CHAPTER 4. Competitive Benchmarking (Financial and Market)
Table 4.1: Financial benchmarking of top five global oil and gas well completion and production companies
Table 4.2: Key financial parameters for top five oil and gas well completion and production companies
Table 4.3: Regional revenue (US $M)
Table 4.4: Regional revenue (%)
Table 4.5: Competitors based on markets served
Table 4.6: Lucintel triad - Top five major players
CHAPTER 5. Company Profile of Baker Hughes Inc.
Table 5.1: Market served: Baker Hughes Inc.
Table 5.2: Lucintel triad – Baker Hughes Inc.
Table 5.3: Financial Benchmarking of Baker Hughes Inc. against best and against Top three and Top five industry players’ average
Table 5.4: Strategic execution – product positioning by segment
Table 5.5: Strategic execution – perceived customer value / quality
Table 5.6: Strategic execution – promotion / communications
Table 5.7: Strategic execution – product distribution by region
CHAPTER 6. Company Profile of Halliburton
Table 6.1: Market served – Halliburton
Table 6.2: Lucintel triad – Halliburton
Table 6.3: Financial benchmarking of Halliburton against best and against Top three and Top five industry players’ average
Table 6.4: Strategic execution – product positioning by segment
Table 6.5: Strategic execution – perceived customer value / quality
Table 6.6: Strategic execution – promotion / communications
Table 6.7: Strategic execution – product distribution by region
CHAPTER 7. Company Profile of National Oilwell Varco Inc.
Table 7.1: Market served – National Oilwell Varco Inc.
Table 7.2: Lucintel triad – National Oilwell Varco Inc.
Table 7.3: Financial benchmarking of National Oilwell Varco Inc. against best and against Top three and Top five industry players’ average
Table 7.4: Strategic execution – product positioning by segment
Table 7.5: Strategic execution – perceived customer value / quality
Table 7.6: Strategic execution – promotion / communications
Table 7.7: Strategic execution – product distribution by region
CHAPTER 8. Company Profile of Schlumberger Ltd.
Table 8.1: Market served – Schlumberger Ltd.
Table 8.2: Lucintel triad – Schlumberger Ltd.
Table 8.3: Financial Benchmarking of Schlumberger Ltd. against best and against Top three and top five industry players’ average
Table 8.4: Strategic execution – product positioning by segment
Table 8.5: Strategic execution – perceived customer value / quality
Table 8.6: Strategic execution – promotion / communications
Table 8.7: Strategic execution – product distribution by region
CHAPTER 9. Company Profile of Weatherford International Ltd.
Table 9.1: Markets Served – Weatherford International Ltd.
Table 9.2: Lucintel triad – Weatherford International Ltd.
Table 9.3: Financial Benchmarking of Weatherford International Ltd. against best and against Top three and top five industry players’ average
Table 9.4: Strategic execution – product positioning by segment
Table 9.5: Strategic execution – perceived customer value / quality
Table 9.6: Strategic execution – promotion / communications
Table 9.7: Strategic execution – product distribution by region