Top Five Global Oil and Gas Field Equipment and Infrastructure Companies: Performance, Strategies, and Competitive Analysis,

The global oil and gas field equipment and infrastructure industry is a segment of the global oil and gas field equipment and services industry. Both industries, which have witnessed high growth in recent years, are expected to continue their growth momentum. The oil and gas field equipment and infrastructure industry is estimated

to reach $202.4 billion by 2017, growing at a CAGR of 8.3%.

Lucintel, a leading global management consulting and market research firm, has conducted a competitive analysis of the global oil and gas field equipment and infrastructure industry and presents its findings in “Top Five Global Oil and Gas Field Equipment and Infrastructure Companies: Performance, Strategies, and Competitive Analysis.” This report briefly discusses the subject companies, their geographic footprints, financial metrics, market performance, marketing and corporate strategies, and provides a SWOT analysis of each.

The industry has encountered serious threats from domestic and international regulations along with political and environmental matters. Due to various rules and regulation compliance issues, companies in the industry have had to incur additional expenses. Rapid declines in cash reserves of the industry due to increased capital expenditure and increased payables have affected the industry in financing its operations.

Lucintel’s report provides a concise overview of the main drivers of the industry. Rising opportunities in deep-water exploration and production activities, with an expectation of the majority of natural gas and oil production to be from offshore platforms accelerates industry growth. Another reason for growth has been the strategic acquisitions and alliances forged to expand global reach and a product portfolio that caters to the changing demand of the customers.

The report covers the top five global oil and gas field equipment and infrastructure companies:
 

Oil and gas field equipment and infrastructure market report will save hundreds of hours of your own personal research time and will significantly benefit you in expanding your business opportunities in global oil and gas field equipment and infrastructure companies industry. In today’s chaotic economy, you need every advantage that you can find to keep ahead in your business
 
In Lucintel's newest competitive research study on the world's oil and gas field equipment and infrastructure companies, we have thoroughly profiled following five companies with detailed competitive assessments:  
                     

The detailed analysis of each company offers a critical view into key strategic areas, including:
 

To make any investment, business or strategic decisions, you need adequate and timely information. Oil and gas field equipment and infrastructure market report fulfills this core need. This is an indispensable reference guide for industry executives who are dealing with oil and gas field equipment and infrastructure companies industry.

Some of the features of Top Five Global Oil and Gas Field Equipment and Infrastructure Companies: Performance, Strategies, and Competitive Analysis market intelligence report are:
 

List of Figures

CHAPTER 3. Market Opportunity

Figure 3.1: Supply chain for oil and gas field equipment and infrastructure market

Figure 3.2: Global oil and gas field equipment and infrastructure industry annual trend 2006-2011 (US $B)

Figure 3.3: Global oil and gas field equipment and infrastructure industry regional trend 2006-2011 (US $B)

Figure 3.4: Global oil and gas field equipment and infrastructure industry regional trend 2006-2011 (%)

Figure 3.5: Global oil and gas field equipment and infrastructure industry opportunity by region

 

CHAPTER 4.Competitive Benchmarking (Financial and Market)

Figure 4.1: Top five oil and gas field equipment and infrastructure companies – financial benchmarking

Figure 4.2: Global top five oil and gas field equipment and infrastructure companies gross profit and net profit analysis – 2011

Figure 4.3: Financial analysis – growth leadership quadrant (2011)

Figure 4.4: Market share of top players 2006

Figure 4.5: Market share of top players 2011

Figure 4.6: 2006 Market share analysis

Figure 4.7: 2011 Market share analysis

Figure 4.8: Global market share analysis 2011

Figure 4.9: Global market fragmentation 2011  

Figure 4.10: Market value North America (US $B)

Figure 4.11: Market value Europe (US $B)

Figure 4.12: Market value Asia Pacific (US $B)

Figure 4.13: Market value ROW (US $B)

Figure 4.14: Regional revenue evaluation 2011 (US $M)

Figure 4.15: Regional revenue evaluation 2011 (%)

Figure 4.16: North American revenue trend for top players 2007-2011 (US $B)

Figure 4.17: Europe revenue trend for top players 2007-2011 (US $B)

Figure 4.18: Asia Pacific revenue trend for top players 2007-2011 (US $B)

Figure 4.19: Row revenue trend for top players 2007-2011 (US $B)

Figure 4.20: Lucintel triad - top five major players

 

CHAPTER 5. Company Profile of Cameron International

Figure 5.1: Cameron International’s revenue by business structure 2011

Figure 5.2: Lucintel Triad – Cameron International

Figure 5.3: Financial benchmarking Cameron International against top three and top five industry players’ average

Figure 5.4: Financial benchmarking of Cameron International against Top Five best

Figure 5.5: Global industry revenue trend Vs Cameron International (2007-2011) in US $B

Figure 5.6: Global market share trend for Cameron International (2007-2011) in (%)

Figure 5.7: North American industry revenue trend Vs Cameron International 2007-2011 in (US $B)

Figure 5.8: European industry revenue trend Vs Cameron International 2007-2011 in (US $B)

Figure 5.9: APAC industry revenue trend Vs Cameron International 2007-2011 in (US $B)

Figure 5.10: ROW industry revenue trend Vs Cameron International 2007-2011 in (US $B)

Figure 5.11: North American market share trend Vs Cameron International 2007-2011 in (%)

Figure 5.12: European market share trend Vs Cameron International 2007-2011 in (%)

Figure 5.13: APAC market share trend Vs Cameron International 2007-2011 in (%)

Figure 5.14: ROW market share trend Vs Cameron International 2007-2011 in (%)

Figure 5.15: Cameron International trend in R&D expenses 2007-2011 in US $B

Figure 5.16: Cameron International trend in R&D expenses percentage of total revenue

Figure 5.17: Comparison of Cameron International SE R&D expenditure Vs top three & top five players average 2011

Figure 5.18: Cameron International productivity 2007-2011 (US $M)

Figure 5.19: Cameron International fixed asset value 2007-2011 (US $M)

Figure 5.20: Strategic execution

 

CHAPTER 6. Company Profile of National Oilwell Varco

Figure 6.1: National Oilwell Varco revenue by business structure 2011

Figure 6.2: Lucintel triad - National Oilwell Varco

Figure 6.3: Financial benchmarking of National Oilwell Varco against top three and top five industry players’ average

Figure 6.4: Financial benchmarking of National Oilwell Varco against Top five best

Figure 6.5: Global industry revenue trend Vs National Oilwell Varco (2007-2011) in (US $B)

Figure 6.6: Global market share trend for National Oilwell Varco (2007-2011) in (%)

Figure 6.7: North American industry revenue trend Vs. National Oilwell Varco 2007-2011 in (US $B)

Figure 6.8: European industry revenue trend Vs National Oilwell Varco 2007-2011 in (US $B)

Figure 6.9: APAC industry revenue trend Vs National Oilwell Varco 2007-2011 in (US $B)

Figure 6.10: ROW industry revenue trend Vs National Oilwell Varco 2007-2011 in (US $B)

Figure 6.11: National Oilwell Varco trend in R&D expenses 2007-2011 in US $B

Figure 6.12: National Oilwell Varco trend in R&D expenses percentage of total revenue

Figure 6.13: Comparison of National Oilwell Varco SE R&D expenditure Vs top three & top five players average 2011

Figure 6.14: North American market share trend Vs National Oilwell Varco 2007-2011 in (%)

Figure 6.15: European market share trend Vs National Oilwell Varco 2007-2011 in (%)

Figure 6.16: APAC market share trend Vs National Oilwell Varco 2007-2011 in (%)

Figure 6.17: ROW market share trend Vs National Oilwell Varco 2007-2011 in (%)

Figure 6.18: National Oilwell Varco productivity 2007-2011 in (US $M)

Figure 6.19: National Oilwell Varco fixed asset value 2007-2011 in (US $M)

Figure 6.20: Strategic execution

 

CHAPTER 7. Company Profile of Saipem S.p.A.

Figure 7.1: Saipem S.p.A. revenue by business structure 2011

Figure 7.2: Lucintel triad – Saipem S.p.A.

Figure 7.3: Financial benchmarking of Saipem S.p.A. against top three and top five industry players’ average

Figure 7.4: Financial benchmarking of Saipem S.p.A. against Top five best

Figure 7.5: Global industry revenue trend Vs Saipem S.p.A. (2007-2011) in (US $B)

Figure 7.6: Global market share trend for Saipem S.p.A. (2007-2011) in (%)

Figure 7.7: North American industry revenue trend Vs Saipem S.p.A. (2007-2011) in (US $B)

Figure 7.8: European industry revenue trend Vs Saipem S.p.A. (2007-2011) in (US $B)

Figure 7.9: APAC industry revenue trend Vs Saipem S.p.A. (2007-2011) in (US $B)

Figure 7.10: ROW industry revenue trend Vs Saipem S.p.A. (2007-2011) in (US $B)

Figure 7.11: North American market share trend Vs Saipem S.p.A. (2007-2011) in (%)

Figure 7.12: European market share trend Vs Saipem S.p.A. (2007-2011) in (%)

Figure 7.13: APAC market share trend Vs Saipem S.p.A. (2007-2011) in (%)

Figure 7.14: ROW market share trend Vs Saipem S.p.A. (2007-2011) in (%)

Figure 7.15: Saipem S.p.A. trend in R&D expenses 2007-2011 in US $B

Figure 7.16: Saipem S.p.A. trend in R&D expenses percentage of total revenue

Figure 7.17: Comparison of Saipem S.p.A. SE R&D expenditure Vs top three & top five players average 2011

Figure 7.18: Saipem S.p.A. productivity 2007-2011 in (US $M)

Figure 7.19: Saipem S.p.A. fixed asset value 2007-2011 in (US $M)

Figure 7.20: Strategic execution

 

CHAPTER 8. Company Profile of Subsea 7 S.A.

Figure 8.1: Subsea 7 S.A. revenue by business structure 2011

Figure 8.2: Lucintel triad – Subsea 7 S.A.

Figure 8.3: Financial benchmarking of Subsea 7 S.A. against top three and top five industry players’ average

Figure 8.4: Financial benchmarking of Subsea 7 S.A. against Top five best

Figure 8.5: Global industry revenue trend Vs Subsea 7 S.A. (2007-2011) in (US $B)

Figure 8.6: Global market share trend for Subsea 7 S.A. (2007-2011) in (%)

Figure 8.7: North American industry revenue trend Vs Subsea 7 S.A. (2007-2011) in (US $B)

Figure 8.8: European industry revenue trend Vs Subsea 7 S.A. (2007-2011) in (US $B)

Figure 8.9: APAC industry revenue trend Vs Subsea 7 S.A. (2007-2011) in (US $B)

Figure 8.10: ROW industry revenue trend Vs Subsea 7 S.A. (2007-2011) in (US $B)

Figure 8.11: North American market share trend Vs Subsea 7 S.A. (2007-2011) in (%)

Figure 8.12: European market share trend Vs Subsea 7 S.A. (2007-2011) in (%)

Figure 8.13: APAC market share trend Vs Subsea 7 S.A. (2007-2011) in (%)

Figure 8.14: ROW market share trend Vs Subsea 7 S.A. (2007-2011) in (%)

Figure 8.15: Subsea 7 S.A. trend in R&D expenses 2007-2011 in US $B

Figure 8.16: Subsea 7 S.A. trend in R&D expenses percentage of total revenue

Figure 8.17: Comparison of Subsea 7 S.A. SE R&D expenditure Vs top three & top five players average 2011

Figure 8.18: Subsea 7 S.A. productivity 2007-2011 in (US $M)

Figure 8.19: Subsea 7 S.A. fixed asset value 2007-2011 in (US $M)

Figure 8.20: Strategic execution

 

CHAPTER 9. Company Profile of Technip

Figure 9.1: Technip revenue by business structure 2011

Figure 9.2: Lucintel triad – Technip

Figure 9.3: Financial benchmarking of Technip against top three and top five industry players’ average

Figure 9.4: Financial benchmarking of Technip against Top five best

Figure 9.5: Global industry revenue trend Vs Technip (2007-2011) in (US $B)

Figure 9.6: Global market share trend for Technip (2007-2011) in (%)

Figure 9.7: North American industry revenue trend Vs Technip (2007-2011) in (US $B)

Figure 9.8: European industry revenue trend Vs Technip (2007-2011) in (US $B)

Figure 9.9: APAC industry revenue trend Vs Technip (2007-2011) in (US $B)

Figure 9.10: ROW industry revenue trend Vs Technip (2007-2011) in (US $B)

Figure 9.11: North American market share trend Vs Technip (2007-2011) in (%)

Figure 9.12: European market share trend Vs Technip (2007-2011) in (%)

Figure 9.13: APAC market share trend Vs Technip (2007-2011) in (%)

Figure 9.14: ROW market share trend Vs Technip (2007-2011) in (%)

Figure 9.15: Technip trend in R&D expenses 2007-2011 in US $B

Figure 9.16: Technip trend in R&D expenses percentage of total revenue

Figure 9.17: Comparison of Technip SE R&D expenditure Vs top three & top five players average 2011

Figure 9.18: Technip productivity 2007-2011 in (US $M)

Figure 9.19: Technip fixed asset value 2007-2011 in (US $M)

Figure 9.20: Strategic execution

 

 

List of Table

 

CHAPTER 3. Market Opportunity

Table 3.1: Industry parameters of global oil and gas field equipment and infrastructure industry

Table 3.2: Relative market attractiveness by region

Table 3.3: Regional revenue growth rate

 

CHAPTER 4. Competitive Benchmarking (Financial and Market)

Table 4.1: Financial benchmarking of top five global oil and gas field equipment and infrastructure companies

Table 4.2: Key financial parameters for top five oil and gas field equipment and infrastructure companies

Table 4.3: Regional revenue (US $M)

Table 4.4: Regional revenue (%)

Table 4.5: Competitors based on markets served

Table 4.6: Lucintel triad - Top five major players

 

CHAPTER 5. Company Profile of Cameron International

Table 5.1:  Market served: Cameron International

Table 5.2:  Lucintel triad – Cameron International

Table 5.3:  Financial Benchmarking of Cameron International against best and against Top three and Top five industry players’ average

Table 5.4:  Strategic execution – product positioning by segment

Table 5.5:  Strategic execution – perceived customer value / quality

Table 5.6:  Strategic execution – promotion / communications

Table 5.7:  Strategic execution – product distribution by region

 

CHAPTER 6. Company Profile of National Oilwell Varco

Table 6.1: Market served – National Oilwell Varco

Table 6.2: Lucintel triad – National Oilwell Varco

Table 6.3: Financial benchmarking of National Oilwell Varco against best and against Top three and Top five industry players’ average

Table 6.4: Strategic execution – product positioning by segment

Table 6.5: Strategic execution – perceived customer value / quality

Table 6.6: Strategic execution – promotion / communications

Table 6.7: Strategic execution – product distribution by region

 

CHAPTER 7. Company Profile of Saipem S.p.A.

Table 7.1: Market served – Saipem S.p.A.

Table 7.2: Lucintel triad – Saipem S.p.A.

Table 7.3: Financial benchmarking of Saipem S.p.A.  against best and against Top three and Top five industry players’ average

Table 7.4: Strategic execution – product positioning by segment

Table 7.5: Strategic execution – perceived customer value / quality

Table 7.6: Strategic execution – promotion / communications

Table 7.7: Strategic execution – product distribution by region

 

CHAPTER 8. Company Profile of Subsea 7 S.A.

Table 8.1: Market served – Subsea 7 S.A.

Table 8.2: Lucintel triad – Subsea 7 S.A.

Table 8.3: Financial Benchmarking of Subsea 7 S.A. against best and against Top three and top five industry players’ average

Table 8.4: Strategic execution – product positioning by segment

Table 8.5: Strategic execution – perceived customer value / quality

Table 8.6: Strategic execution – promotion / communications

Table 8.7: Strategic execution – product distribution by region

 

CHAPTER 9. Company Profile of Technip

Table 9.1: Markets Served – Technip

Table 9.2: Lucintel triad – Technip

Table 9.3: Financial Benchmarking of Technip against best and against Top three and top five industry players’ average

Table 9.4: Strategic execution – product positioning by segment

Table 9.5: Strategic execution – perceived customer value / quality

Table 9.6: Strategic execution – promotion / communications

Table 9.7: Strategic execution – product distribution by region