Table of Contents
1. Executive Summary
2. Market Definition and Scope
3. Market Opportunity
4. Competitive Benchmarking (Financial and Market)
5. Company Profile on Following Parameters
6. Profiles on Following Companies
6.1. CGGVeritas Inc
6.2. Geokinetics, Inc
6.3. Halliburton
6.4. Petroleum Geo-Services ASA
6.5. Schlumberger Ltd
List of Figures
Chapter 3. Market Opportunity
Figure 3.1: Supply chain for oil and gas exploration and evaluation market
Figure 3.2: Global oil and gas exploration and evaluation industry annual trend 2006-2011 (US $B)
Figure 3.3: Global oil and gas exploration and evaluation industry regional trend 2006-2011 (US $B)
Figure 3.4: Global oil and gas exploration and evaluation industry regional trend 2006-2011 (%)
Figure 3.5: Global oil and gas exploration and evaluation industry opportunity by region
Chapter 4.Competitive Benchmarking (Financial and Market)
Figure 4.1: Top five oil and gas exploration and evaluation companies – financial benchmarking
Figure 4.2: Global top five oil and gas exploration and evaluation companies gross profit and net profit analysis – 2011
Figure 4.3: Financial analysis – growth leadership quadrant (2011)
Figure 4.4: Market share of top players 2006
Figure 4.5: Market share of top players 2011
Figure 4.6: 2006 Market share analysis
Figure 4.7: 2011 Market share analysis
Figure 4.8: Global market share analysis 2011
Figure 4.9: Global market fragmentation 2011
Figure 4.10: Market value North America (US $B)
Figure 4.11: Market value Europe (US $B)
Figure 4.12: Market value Asia Pacific (US $B)
Figure 4.13: Market value ROW (US $B)
Figure 4.14: Regional revenue evaluation 2011 (US $M)
Figure 4.15: Regional revenue evaluation 2011 (%)
Figure 4.16: North American revenue trend for top players 2007-2011 (US $B)
Figure 4.17: Europe revenue trend for top players 2007-2011 (US $B)
Figure 4.18: Asia Pacific revenue trend for top players 2007-2011 (US $B)
Figure 4.19: Row revenue trend for top players 2007-2011 (US $B)
Figure 4.20: Lucintel triad - top five major players
Chapter 5. Company Profile of CGGVeritas Inc.
Figure 5.1: CGGVeritas Inc.’s revenue by business structure 2011
Figure 5.2: Lucintel Triad – CGGVeritas Inc.
Figure 5.3: Financial benchmarking CGGVeritas Inc. against top three and top five industry players’ average
Figure 5.4: Financial benchmarking of CGGVeritas Inc. against Top Five best
Figure 5.5: Global industry revenue trend Vs CGGVeritas Inc. (2007-2011) in US $B
Figure 5.6: Global market share trend for CGGVeritas Inc. (2007-2011) in (%)
Figure 5.7: North American industry revenue trend Vs CGGVeritas Inc. 2007-2011 in (US $B)
Figure 5.8: European industry revenue trend Vs CGGVeritas Inc. 2007-2011 in (US $B)
Figure 5.9: APAC industry revenue trend Vs CGGVeritas Inc. 2007-2011 in (US $B)
Figure 5.10: ROW industry revenue trend Vs CGGVeritas Inc. 2007-2011 in (US $B)
Figure 5.11: North American market share trend Vs CGGVeritas Inc. 2007-2011 in (%)
Figure 5.12: European market share trend Vs CGGVeritas Inc. 2007-2011 in (%)
Figure 5.13: APAC market share trend Vs CGGVeritas Inc. 2007-2011 in (%)
Figure 5.14: ROW market share trend Vs CGGVeritas Inc. 2007-2011 in (%)
Figure 5.15: CGGVeritas Inc. trend in R&D expenses 2007-2011 in US $B
Figure 5.16: CGGVeritas Inc. trend in R&D expenses percentage of total revenue
Figure 5.17: Comparison of CGGVeritas Inc. R&D expenditure Vs top three & top five players average 2011
Figure 5.18: CGGVeritas Inc. productivity 2007-2011 (US $M)
Figure 5.19: CGGVeritas Inc. fixed asset value 2007-2011 (US $M)
Figure 5.20: Strategic execution
Chapter 6. Company Profile of Geokinetics, Inc.
Figure 6.1: Geokinetics, Inc. revenue by business structure 2011
Figure 6.2: Lucintel triad - Geokinetics, Inc.
Figure 6.3: Financial benchmarking of Geokinetics, Inc. against top three and top five industry players’ average
Figure 6.4: Financial benchmarking of Geokinetics, Inc. against Top five best
Figure 6.5: Global industry revenue trend Vs Geokinetics, Inc. (2007-2011) in (US $B)
Figure 6.6: Global market share trend for Geokinetics, Inc. (2007-2011) in (%)
Figure 6.7: North American industry revenue trend Vs. Geokinetics, Inc. 2007-2011 in (US $B)
Figure 6.8: European industry revenue trend Vs Geokinetics, Inc. 2007-2011 in (US $B)
Figure 6.9: APAC industry revenue trend Vs Geokinetics, Inc. 2007-2011 in (US $B)
Figure 6.10: ROW industry revenue trend Vs Geokinetics, Inc. 2007-2011 in (US $B)
Figure 6.11: Geokinetics, Inc. trend in R&D expenses 2007-2011 in US $B
Figure 6.12: Geokinetics, Inc. trend in R&D expenses percentage of total revenue
Figure 6.13: Comparison of Geokinetics, Inc. SE R&D expenditure Vs top three & top five players average 2011
Figure 6.14: North American market share trend Vs Geokinetics, Inc. 2007-2011 in (%)
Figure 6.15: European market share trend Vs Geokinetics, Inc. 2007-2011 in (%)
Figure 6.16: APAC market share trend Vs Geokinetics, Inc. 2007-2011 in (%)
Figure 6.17: ROW market share trend Vs Geokinetics, Inc. 2007-2011 in (%)
Figure 6.18: Geokinetics, Inc. productivity 2007-2011 in (US $M)
Figure 6.19: Geokinetics, Inc. fixed asset value 2007-2011 in (US $M)
Figure 6.20: Strategic execution
Chapter 7. Company Profile of Halliburton
Figure 7.1: Halliburton revenue by business structure 2011
Figure 7.2: Lucintel triad – Halliburton
Figure 7.3: Financial benchmarking of Halliburton against top three and top five industry players’ average
Figure 7.4: Financial benchmarking of Halliburton against Top five best
Figure 7.5: Global industry revenue trend Vs Halliburton (2007-2011) in (US $B)
Figure 7.6: Global market share trend for Halliburton (2007-2011) in (%)
Figure 7.7: North American industry revenue trend Vs Halliburton (2007-2011) in (US $B)
Figure 7.8: European industry revenue trend Vs Halliburton (2007-2011) in (US $B)
Figure 7.9: APAC industry revenue trend Vs Halliburton (2007-2011) in (US $B)
Figure 7.10: ROW industry revenue trend Vs Halliburton (2007-2011) in (US $B)
Figure 7.11: North American market share trend Vs Halliburton (2007-2011) in (%)
Figure 7.12: European market share trend Vs Halliburton (2007-2011) in (%)
Figure 7.13: APAC market share trend Vs Halliburton (2007-2011) in (%)
Figure 7.14: ROW market share trend Vs Halliburton (2007-2011) in (%)
Figure 7.15: Halliburton trend in R&D expenses 2007-2011 in US $B
Figure 7.16: Halliburton trend in R&D expenses percentage of total revenue
Figure 7.17: Comparison of Halliburton R&D expenditure Vs top three & top five players average 2011
Figure 7.18: Halliburton productivity 2007-2011 in (US $M)
Figure 7.19: Halliburton fixed asset value 2007-2011 in (US $M)
Figure 7.20: Strategic execution
Chapter 8. Company Profile of Petroleum Geo-Services ASA
Figure 8.1: Petroleum Geo-Services ASA revenue by business structure 2011
Figure 8.2: Lucintel triad – Petroleum Geo-Services ASA
Figure 8.3: Financial benchmarking of Petroleum Geo-Services ASA against top three and top five industry players’ average
Figure 8.4: Financial benchmarking of Petroleum Geo-Services ASA against Top five best
Figure 8.5: Global industry revenue trend Vs Petroleum Geo-Services ASA (2007-2011) in (US $B)
Figure 8.6: Global market share trend for Petroleum Geo-Services ASA (2007-2011) in (%)
Figure 8.7: North American industry revenue trend Vs Petroleum Geo-Services ASA (2007-2011) in (US $B)
Figure 8.8: European industry revenue trend Vs Petroleum Geo-Services ASA (2007-2011) in (US $B)
Figure 8.9: APAC industry revenue trend Vs Petroleum Geo-Services ASA (2007-2011) in (US $B)
Figure 8.10: ROW industry revenue trend Vs Petroleum Geo-Services ASA (2007-2011) in (US $B)
Figure 8.11: North American market share trend Vs Petroleum Geo-Services ASA (2007-2011) in (%)
Figure 8.12: European market share trend Vs Petroleum Geo-Services ASA (2007-2011) in (%)
Figure 8.13: APAC market share trend Vs Petroleum Geo-Services ASA (2007-2011) in (%)
Figure 8.14: ROW market share trend Vs Petroleum Geo-Services ASA (2007-2011) in (%)
Figure 8.15: Petroleum Geo-Services ASA trend in R&D expenses 2007-2011 in US $B
Figure 8.16: Petroleum Geo-Services ASA trend in R&D expenses percentage of total revenue
Figure 8.17: Comparison of Petroleum Geo-Services ASA R&D expenditure Vs top three & top five players average 2011
Figure 8.18: Petroleum Geo-Services ASA productivity 2007-2011 in (US $M)
Figure 8.19: Petroleum Geo-Services ASA fixed asset value 2007-2011 in (US $M)
Figure 8.20: Strategic execution
Chapter 9. Company Profile of Schlumberger Ltd.
Figure 9.1: Schlumberger Ltd. revenue by business structure 2011
Figure 9.2: Lucintel triad – Schlumberger Ltd.
Figure 9.3: Financial benchmarking of Schlumberger Ltd. against top three and top five industry players’ average
Figure 9.4: Financial benchmarking of Schlumberger Ltd. against Top five best
Figure 9.5: Global industry revenue trend Vs Schlumberger Ltd. (2007-2011) in (US $B)
Figure 9.6: Global market share trend for Schlumberger Ltd. (2007-2011) in (%)
Figure 9.7: North American industry revenue trend Vs Schlumberger Ltd. (2007-2011) in (US $B)
Figure 9.8: European industry revenue trend Vs Schlumberger Ltd. (2007-2011) in (US $B)
Figure 9.9: APAC industry revenue trend Vs Schlumberger Ltd. (2007-2011) in (US $B)
Figure 9.10: ROW industry revenue trend Vs Schlumberger Ltd. (2007-2011) in (US $B)
Figure 9.11: North American market share trend Vs Schlumberger Ltd. (2007-2011) in (%)
Figure 9.12: European market share trend Vs Schlumberger Ltd. (2007-2011) in (%)
Figure 9.13: APAC market share trend Vs Schlumberger Ltd. (2007-2011) in (%)
Figure 9.14: ROW market share trend Vs Schlumberger Ltd. (2007-2011) in (%)
Figure 9.15: Schlumberger Ltd. trend in R&D expenses 2007-2011 in US $B
Figure 9.16: Schlumberger Ltd. trend in R&D expenses percentage of total revenue
Figure 9.17: Comparison of Schlumberger Ltd. R&D expenditure Vs top three & top five players average 2011
Figure 9.18: Schlumberger Ltd. productivity 2007-2011 in (US $M)
Figure 9.19: Schlumberger Ltd. fixed asset value 2007-2011 in (US $M)
Figure 9.20: Strategic execution
List of Tables
Table 3.1: Industry parameters of global oil and gas exploration and evaluation industry
Table 3.2: Relative market attractiveness by region
Table 3.3: Regional revenue growth rate
Chapter 4. Competitive Benchmarking (Financial and Market)
Table 4.1: Financial benchmarking of top five global oil and gas exploration and evaluation companies
Table 4.2: Key financial parameters for top five oil and gas exploration and evaluation companies
Table 4.3: Regional revenue (US $M)
Table 4.4: Regional revenue (%)
Table 4.5: Competitors based on markets served
Table 4.6: Lucintel triad - Top five major players
Chapter 5. Company Profile of CGGVeritas Inc.
Table 5.1: Market served: CGGVeritas Inc.
Table 5.2: Lucintel triad – CGGVeritas Inc.
Table 5.3: Financial Benchmarking of CGGVeritas Inc. against best and against Top three and Top five industry players’ average
Table 5.4: Strategic execution – product positioning by segment
Table 5.5: Strategic execution – perceived customer value / quality
Table 5.6: Strategic execution – promotion / communications
Table 5.7: Strategic execution – product distribution by region
Chapter 6. Company Profile of Geokinetics, Inc.
Table 6.1: Market served – Geokinetics, Inc.
Table 6.2: Lucintel triad – Geokinetics, Inc.
Table 6.3: Financial benchmarking of Geokinetics, Inc. against best and against Top three and Top five industry players’ average
Table 6.4: Strategic execution – product positioning by segment
Table 6.5: Strategic execution – perceived customer value / quality
Table 6.6: Strategic execution – promotion / communications
Table 6.7: Strategic execution – product distribution by region
Chapter 7. Company Profile of Halliburton
Table 7.1: Market served – Halliburton
Table 7.2: Lucintel triad – Halliburton
Table 7.3: Financial benchmarking of Halliburton against best and against Top three and Top five industry players’ average
Table 7.4: Strategic execution – product positioning by segment
Table 7.5: Strategic execution – perceived customer value / quality
Table 7.6: Strategic execution – promotion / communications
Table 7.7: Strategic execution – product distribution by region
Chapter 8. Company Profile of Petroleum Geo-Services ASA
Table 8.1: Market served – Petroleum Geo-Services ASA
Table 8.2: Lucintel triad – Petroleum Geo-Services ASA
Table 8.3: Financial Benchmarking of Petroleum Geo-Services ASA against best and against Top three and top five industry players’ average
Table 8.4: Strategic execution – product positioning by segment
Table 8.5: Strategic execution – perceived customer value / quality
Table 8.6: Strategic execution – promotion / communications
Table 8.7: Strategic execution – product distribution by region
Chapter 9. Company Profile of Schlumberger Ltd.
Table 9.1: Markets Served – Schlumberger Ltd.
Table 9.2: Lucintel triad – Schlumberger Ltd.
Table 9.3: Financial Benchmarking of Schlumberger Ltd. against best and against Top three and top five industry players’ average
Table 9.4: Strategic execution – product positioning by segment
Table 9.5: Strategic execution – perceived customer value / quality
Table 9.6: Strategic execution – promotion / communications
Table 9.7: Strategic execution – product distribution by region