1. Executive Summary
2. Market Definition and Scope
3. Market Opportunity
4. Competitive Benchmarking (Financial and Market)
5. Company Profile on Following Parameters
6. Profiles on Following Companies
6.1. AstraZeneca PLC
6.2. Bristol Myers Squibb Company
6.3. Novartis AG
6.4. Pfizer Inc
6.5. Sanofi
List of Figures
CHAPTER 3. Market Opportunity
Figure 3.1: Supply chain for cardiovascular drug market
Figure 3.2: Global cardiovascular drug industry annual trend 2006-2011 (US $B)
Figure 3.3: Global cardiovascular drug industry regional trend 2006-2011 (US $B)
Figure 3.4: Global cardiovascular drug industry regional trend 2006-2011 (%)
Figure 3.5: Global cardiovascular drug industry segment trend 2006-2011 (US $B)
Figure 3.6: Global cardiovascular drug industry segment trend 2006-2011 (%)
Figure 3.7: Global cardiovascular drug industry opportunity by region
Figure 3.8: Global cardiovascular drug industry opportunity by segment
CHAPTER 4.Competitive Benchmarking (Financial and Market)
Figure 4.1: Top five cardiovascular drug companies – financial benchmarking
Figure 4.2: Global top five cardiovascular drug companies gross profit and net profit analysis – 2011
Figure 4.3: Financial analysis – growth leadership quadrant (2011)
Figure 4.4: Market share of top players 2006
Figure 4.5: Market share of top players 2011
Figure 4.6: 2006 Market share analysis
Figure 4.7: 2011 Market share analysis
Figure 4.8: Global market share analysis 2011
Figure 4.9: Global market fragmentation 2011
Figure 4.10: Market value North America: (US $B)
Figure 4.11: Market value Europe: (US $B)
Figure 4.12: Market value Asia Pacific: (US $B)
Figure 4.13: Market value Row: (US $B)
Figure 4.14: Regional revenue evaluation 2011(US $M)
Figure 4.15: Regional revenue evaluation 2011(%)
Figure 4.16: North American revenue trend for top players 2007-2011 (US $B)
Figure 4.17: Europe revenue trend for top players 2007-2011 (US $B)
Figure 4.18: Asia Pacific revenue trend for top players 2007-2011 (US $B)
Figure 4.19: Row revenue trend for top players 2007-2011 (US $B)
Figure 4.20: Lucintel triad - top five major players
CHAPTER 5. Company Profile of AstraZeneca
Figure 5.1: AstraZeneca’s revenue by business structure 2011
Figure 5.2: Lucintel Triad – AstraZeneca
Figure 5.3: Financial benchmarking AstraZeneca against top three and top five industry players’ average
Figure 5.4: Financial benchmarking of AstraZeneca against Top Five best
Figure 5.5: Global industry revenue trend Vs AstraZeneca (2007-2011) in US $B
Figure 5.6: Global market share trend for AstraZeneca (2007-2011) in (%)
Figure 5.7: North American industry revenue trend Vs AstraZeneca 2007-2011 in (US $B)
Figure 5.8: European industry revenue trend Vs AstraZeneca 2007-2011 in (US $B)
Figure 5.9: APAC industry revenue trend Vs AstraZeneca 2007-2011 in (US $B)
Figure 5.10: ROW industry revenue trend Vs AstraZeneca 2007-2011 in (US $B)
Figure 5.11: North American market share trend Vs AstraZeneca 2007-2011 in (%)
Figure 5.12: European market share trend Vs AstraZeneca 2007-2011 in (%)
Figure 5.13: APAC market share trend Vs AstraZeneca 2007-2011 in (%)
Figure 5.14: ROW market share trend Vs AstraZeneca 2007-2011 in (%)
Figure 5.15: AstraZeneca trend in R&D expenses 2007-2011 in US $B
Figure 5.16: AstraZeneca trend in R&D expenses Percentage of total revenue
Figure 5.17: Comparison of AstraZeneca SE R&D expenditure vs. top three & top five players average 2011
Figure 5.18: AstraZeneca productivity 2007-2011 (US $M)
Figure 5.19: AstraZeneca capital investment value 2007-2011 (US $M)
Figure 5.20: Strategic execution
CHAPTER 6. Company Profile of Bristol-Myers Squibb
Figure 6.1: Bristol-Myers Squibb revenue by business structure 2011
Figure 6.2: Lucintel triad - Bristol-Myers Squibb
Figure 6.3: Financial benchmarking of Bristol-Myers Squibb against top three and top five industry players’ average
Figure 6.4: Financial benchmarking of Bristol-Myers Squibb against Top five best
Figure 6.5: Global industry revenue trend Vs Bristol-Myers Squibb (2007-2011) in (US $B)
Figure 6.6: Global market share trend for Bristol-Myers Squibb (2007-2011) in (%)
Figure 6.7: North American industry revenue trend Vs. Bristol-Myers Squibb 2007-2011 in (US $B)
Figure 6.8: European industry revenue trend Vs Bristol-Myers Squibb 2007-2011 in (US $B)
Figure 6.9: APAC industry revenue trend Vs Bristol-Myers Squibb 2007-2011 in (US $B)
Figure 6.10: ROW industry revenue trend Vs Bristol-Myers Squibb 2007-2011 in (US $B)
Figure 6.11: North American market share trend Vs Bristol-Myers Squibb 2007-2011 in (%)
Figure 6.12: European market share trend Vs Bristol-Myers Squibb 2007-2011 in (%)
Figure 6.13: APAC market share trend Vs DuPont 2007-2011 in (%)
Figure 6.14: ROW market share trend Vs DuPont 2007-2011 in (%)
Figure 6.15: Bristol-Myers Squibb trend in R&D expenses 2007-2011 in US $B
Figure 6.16: Bristol-Myers Squibb trend in R&D expenses Percentage of total revenue
Figure 6.17: Comparison of Bristol-Myers Squibb SE R&D expenditure Vs top three & top five players average 2011
Figure 6.18: Bristol-Myers Squibb productivity: 2007-2011 in (US $M)
Figure 6.19: Bristol-Myers Squibb capital investment value: 2007-2011 in (US $M)
Figure 6.20: Strategic execution
CHAPTER 7. Company Profile of Novartis
Figure 7.1: Novartis revenue by business structure 2011
Figure 7.2: Lucintel triad – Novartis
Figure 7.3: Financial benchmarking of Novartis against top three and top five industry players’ average
Figure 7.4: Financial benchmarking of Novartis against Top five best
Figure 7.5: Global industry revenue trend Vs Novartis (2007-2011) in (US $B)
Figure 7.6: Global market share trend for Novartis (2007-2011) in (%)
Figure 7.7: North American industry revenue trend Vs Novartis (2007-2011) in (US $B)
Figure 7.8: European industry revenue trend Vs Novartis l (2007-2011) in (US $B)
Figure 7.9: APAC industry revenue trend Vs Novartis (2007-2011) in (US $B)
Figure 7.10: ROW industry revenue trend Vs Novartis (2007-2011) in (US $B)
Figure 7.11: North American market share trend Vs Novartis (2007-2011) in (%)
Figure 7.12: European market share trend Vs Novartis l (2007-2011) in (%)
Figure 7.13: APAC market share trend Vs Novartis (2007-2011) in (%)
Figure 7.14: ROW market share trend Vs Novartis (2007-2011) in (%)
Figure 7.15: Novartis trend in R&D expenses 2007-2011 in US $B
Figure 7.16: Novartis trend in R&D expenses Percentage of total revenue
Figure 7.17: Comparison of Novartis R&D expenditure vs top three & top five players average 2011
Figure 7.18: Novartis productivity: 2007-2011 in (US $M)
Figure 7.19: Novartis capital investment value: 2007-2011 in (US $M)
Figure 7.20: Strategic execution
CHAPTER 8. Company Profile of Pfizer
Figure 8.1: Pfizer revenue by business structure 2011
Figure 8.2: Lucintel triad – Pfizer
Figure 8.3: Financial benchmarking of Pfizer against top three and top five industry players’ average
Figure 8.4: Financial benchmarking of Pfizer against Top five best
Figure 8.5: Global industry revenue trend Vs Pfizer (2007-2011) in (US $B)
Figure 8.6: Global market share trend for Pfizer (2007-2011) in (%)
Figure 8.7: North American industry revenue trend Vs Pfizer (2007-2011) in (US $B)
Figure 8.8: European industry revenue trend Vs Pfizer (2007-2011) in (US $B)
Figure 8.9: APAC industry revenue trend Vs Pfizer (2007-2011) in (US $B)
Figure 8.10: ROW industry revenue trend Vs Pfizer (2007-2011) in (US $B)
Figure 8.11: North American market share trend Vs Pfizer (2007-2011) in (%)
Figure 8.12: European market share trend Vs Pfizer (2007-2011) in (%)
Figure 8.13: APAC market share trend Vs Pfizer (2007-2011) in (%)
Figure 8.14: ROW market share trend Vs Pfizer (2007-2011) in (%)
Figure 8.15: Pfizer trend in R&D expenses 2007-2011 in US $B
Figure 8.16: Pfizer trend in R&D expenses Percentage of total revenue
Figure 8.17: Comparison of Pfizer R&D expenditure vs top three & top five players average 2011
Figure 8.18: Pfizer productivity: 2007-2011 in (US $M)
Figure 8.19: Pfizer capital investment value: 2007-2011 in (US $M)
Figure 8.20: Strategic execution
CHAPTER 9. Company Profile of Sanofi
Figure 9.1: Sanofi revenue by business structure 2011
Figure 9.2: Lucintel triad – Sanofi
Figure 9.3: Financial benchmarking of Sanofi against top three and top five industry players’ average
Figure 9.4: Financial benchmarking of Sanofi against Top five best
Figure 9.5: Global industry revenue trend Vs Sanofi (2007-2011) in (US $B)
Figure 9.6: Global market share trend for Sanofi (2007-2011) in (%)
Figure 9.7: North American industry revenue trend Vs Sanofi (2007-2011) in (US $B)
Figure 9.8: European industry revenue trend Vs Sanofi (2007-2011) in (US $B)
Figure 9.9: APAC industry revenue trend Vs Sanofi (2007-2011) in (US $B)
Figure 9.10: ROW industry revenue trend Vs Sanofi (2007-2011) in (US $B)
Figure 9.11: North American market share trend Vs Sanofi (2007-2011) in (%)
Figure 9.12: European market share trend Vs Sanofi (2007-2011) in (%)
Figure 9.13: APAC market share trend Vs Sanofi (2007-2011) in (%)
Figure 9.14: ROW market share trend Vs Sanofi (2007-2011) in (%)
Figure 9.15: Sanofi trend in R&D expenses 2007-2011 in US $B
Figure 9.16: Sanofi trend in R&D expenses Percentage of total revenue
Figure 9.17: Comparison of Sanofi R&D expenditure vs top three & top five players average 2011
Figure 9.18: Sanofi productivity: 2007-2011 in (US $M)
Figure 9.19: Sanofi capital investment value: 2007-2011 in (US $M)
Figure 9.20: Strategic execution
List of Tables
CHAPTER 3. Market Opportunity
Table 3.1: Industry parameters of global cardiovascular drug industry
Table 3.2: Relative market attractiveness by region
Table 3.3: Regional revenue growth rate
Table 3.4: Segment revenue growth rate
CHAPTER 4. Competitive Benchmarking (Financial and Market)
Table 4.1: Financial benchmarking of top five global cardiovascular drug companies
Table 4.2: Key financial parameters for top five cardiovascular drug companies
Table 4.3: Regional revenue (US $M)
Table 4.4: Regional revenue (%)
Table 4.5: Competitors based on markets served
Table 4.6: Lucintel triad - Top five major players
CHAPTER 5. Company Profile of AstraZeneca
Table 5.1: Market served: AstraZeneca
Table 5.2: Lucintel triad – AstraZeneca
Table 5.3: Financial Benchmarking of AstraZeneca against best and against Top three and Top five industry players’ average
Table 5.4: Strategic execution – product positioning by segment
Table 5.5: Strategic execution – perceived customer value / quality
Table 5.6: Strategic execution – promotion / communications
Table 5.7: Strategic execution – product distribution by region
CHAPTER 6. Company Profile of Bristol-Myers Squibb
Table 6.1: Market served – Bristol-Myers Squibb
Table 6.2: Lucintel triad – Bristol-Myers Squibb
Table 6.3: Financial benchmarking of Bristol-Myers Squibb against best and against Top three and Top five industry players’ average
Table 6.4: Strategic execution – product positioning by segment
Table 6.5: Strategic execution – perceived customer value / quality
Table 6.6: Strategic execution – promotion / communications
Table 6.7: Strategic execution – product distribution by region
CHAPTER 7. Company Profile of Novartis
Table 7.1: Market served – Novartis
Table 7.2: Lucintel triad – Novartis
Table 7.3: Financial benchmarking of Novartis against best and against Top three and Top five industry players’ average
Table 7.4: Strategic execution – product positioning by segment
Table 7.5: Strategic execution – perceived customer value / quality
Table 7.6: Strategic execution – promotion / communications
Table 7.7: Strategic execution – product distribution by region
CHAPTER 8. Company Profile of Pfizer
Table 8.1: Market served – Pfizer
Table 8.2: Lucintel triad – Pfizer
Table 8.3: Financial Benchmarking of Pfizer against best and against Top three and top five industry players’ average
Table 8.4: Strategic execution – product positioning by segment
Table 8.5: Strategic execution – perceived customer value / quality
Table 8.6: Strategic execution – promotion / communications
Table 8.7: Strategic execution – product distribution by region
CHAPTER 9. Company Profile of Sanofi
Table 9.1: Markets Served – Sanofi
Table 9.2: Lucintel triad – Sanofi
Table 9.3: Financial Benchmarking of Sanofi against best and against Top three and top five industry players’ average
Table 9.4: Strategic execution – product positioning by segment
Table 9.5: Strategic execution – perceived customer value / quality
Table 9.6: Strategic execution – promotion / communications
Table 9.7: Strategic execution – product distribution by region