Table of Contents
1. Executive Summary
2. Industry Background and Classifications
2.1: Introduction, Background, and Classification
2.2: Supply Chain
2.3: Industry Drivers and Challenges
3. Market Trends and Forecast Analysis from 2013 to 2024
3.1: Macroeconomic Trends and Forecast
3.2: Global Oilfield Stimulation Chemicals Market: Trends and Forecast
3.3: Global Oilfield Stimulation Chemicals Market by Product Type
3.3.1: Friction Reducer
3.3.2: Acids and biocides
3.3.3: Corrosion Inhibitors
3.3.4: Gelling Agent
3.3.5: Iron Control Agent
3.3.6: Water Control
3.4: Global Oilfield Stimulation Chemicals Market by End Use Industry:
3.4.1: Hydraulic Fracturing
3.4.2: Matrix Treatments
3.4.3: Acid Fracking
4. Market Trends and Forecast Analysis by Region
4.1: Global Oilfield Stimulation Chemicals Market by Region
4.2: North American Oilfield Stimulation Chemicals Market
4.2.1: Market by Product Type: Friction Reducer, Acids and biocides, Corrosion Inhibitors, Gelling
Agent, Iron Control Agent, and Water Control
4.2.2: Market by End Use Industry: Hydraulic Fracturing, Matrix Treatments, and Acid Fracking
4.2.3: Market by Country: US, Canada, and Mexico
4.3: European Oilfield Stimulation Chemicals Market
4.3.1: Market by Product Type: Friction Reducer, Acids and biocides, Corrosion Inhibitors, Gelling
Agent, Iron Control Agent, and Water Control
4.3.2: Market by End Use Industry: Hydraulic Fracturing, Matrix Treatments, and Acid Fracking
4.3.3: Market by Country: Germany, France, U.K., Spain, and Russia
4.4: APAC Oilfield Stimulation Chemicals Market
4.4.1: Market by Product Type: Friction Reducer, Acids and biocides, Corrosion Inhibitors, Gelling
Agent, Iron Control Agent, and Water Control
4.4.2: Market by End Use Industry: Hydraulic Fracturing, Matrix Treatments, and Acid Fracking
4.4.3: Market by Country: China, India, Japan, South Korea and Thailand
4.5: ROW Oilfield Stimulation Chemicals Market
4.5.1: Market by Product Type: Friction Reducer, Acids and biocides, Corrosion Inhibitors, Gelling
Agent, Iron Control Agent, and Water Control
4.5.2: Market by End Use Industry: Hydraulic Fracturing, Matrix Treatments, and Acid Fracking
5. Competitor Analysis
5.1: Product Portfolio Analysis
5.2: Market Share Analysis
5.3: Operational Integration
5.4: Geographical Reach
5.5: Porter’s Five Forces Analysis
6. Growth Opportunities and Strategic Analysis
6.1: Growth Opportunity Analysis
6.1.1: Growth Opportunities for Global Oilfield Stimulation Chemicals Market by Product Type
6.1.2: Growth Opportunities for Global Oilfield Stimulation Chemicals Market by End Use Industry
6.1.3: Growth Opportunities for Global Oilfield Stimulation Chemicals Market by Region
6.2: Emerging Trends in Global Oilfield Stimulation Chemicals Market
6.3: Strategic Analysis
6.3.1: New Product Development
6.3.2: Capacity Expansion of Global Oilfield Stimulation Chemicals Market
6.3.3: Mergers, Acquisitions and Joint Ventures in the Global Market
7. Company Profiles of Leading Players
7.1: BASF SE
7.2: Baker Hughes Incorporated
7.3: DOW Chemical Company
7.4: E.I Dupont
7.5: Flotek Industries Inc
7.6: Halliburton
7.7: Schlumberger Limited
7.8: Chevron Phillips Chemical Company
7.9: Clariant AG
7.10: Ashland Inc.
7.11: Akzonobel N.V.
7.12: Albemarle Corp.
7.13: Solvay SA
Please sign in or fill up below form to get sample pages on Oilfield Stimulation Chemical Market 2019-2024. We will email you the sample pages.
At Lucintel, we respect your privacy and maintain the confidentiality of information / data provided by you
* These fields are mandatory. At Report Banana, we respect your privacy and maintain the confidentiality of information / data provided by you.