Table of Contents
1. Executive Summary
2. Market Definition and Scope
3. Market Opportunity
4. Competitive Benchmarking (Financial and Market)
5. Company Profile
-
Company Overview
-
Benchmarking (Financial & Market)
-
SWOT Analysis
-
Product Positioning
-
Marketing Strategy and Tactics
-
Corporate Strategy
List of Figures
Chapter 3. Market Opportunity
Figure 3.1: Supply beauty care products Industry
Figure 3.2: Global beauty care products Industry annual trend 2006-2011 (US $B)
Figure 3.3: Global beauty care products Industry regional trend 2006-2011 (US $B)
Figure 3.4: Global beauty care products Industry regional trend 2006-2011 (%)
Figure 3.5: Global beauty care products Industry segment trend 2006-2011 (US $B)
Figure 3.6: Global beauty care products Industry segment trend 2006-2011 (%)
Figure 3.7: Global beauty care products Industry opportunity by region
Figure 3.8: Global beauty care products Industry opportunity by segment
Chapter 4.Competitive Benchmarking (Financial and Market)
Figure 4.1: top five global beauty care products manufacturers – financial benchmarking
Figure 4.2: Global beauty care products manufacturers gross profit and net profit analysis – 2011
Figure 4.3: Financial analysis – growth leadership quadrant (2011)
Figure 4.4: Market share of top players 2006
Figure 4.5: Market share of top players 2011
Figure 4.6: 2006 Market share analysis
Figure 4.7: 2011 Market share analysis
Figure 4.8: Global market share analysis 2011
Figure 4.9: Global market fragmentation 2011
Figure 4.10: Market value North America (US $B)
Figure 4.11: Market value Europe (US $B)
Figure 4.12: Market value Asia Pacific (US $B)
Figure 4.13: Market value ROW (US $B)
Figure 4.14: Regional revenue evaluation 2011 (US $M)
Figure 4.15: Regional revenue evaluation 2011 (%)
Figure 4.16: North American revenue trend for top players 2007-2011 (US $B)
Figure 4.17: Europe revenue trend for top players 2007-2011 (US $B)
Figure 4.18: Asia Pacific revenue trend for top players 2007-2011 (US $B)
Figure 4.19: Row revenue trend for top players 2007-2011 (US $B)
Figure 4.20: Lucintel triad - top five major players
Chapter 5. Company Profile of Avon Products Inc
Figure 5.1: Avon Products Inc.’s revenue by business structure 2011
Figure 5.2: Lucintel Triad –Avon Products Inc
Figure 5.3: Financial benchmarking. Avon Products Inc against top three and top five industry players’ average
Figure 5.4: Financial benchmarking of Avon Products Inc. against Top Five best
Figure 5.5: Global industry revenue trend Vs Avon Products Inc (2007-2011) in US $B
Figure 5.6: Global market share trend for Avon Products Inc (2007-2011) in (%)
Figure 5.7: North American industry revenue trend Vs Avon Products Inc 2007-2011 in (US $B)
Figure 5.8: European industry revenue trend Vs Avon Products Inc 2007-2011 in (US $B)
Figure 5.9: APAC industry revenue trend Vs Avon Products Inc 2007-2011 in (US $B)
Figure 5.10: ROW industry revenue trend Vs Avon Products Inc 2007-2011 in (US $B)
Figure 5.11: North American market share trend Vs. Avon Products Inc 2007-2011 in (%)
Figure 5.12: European market share trend Vs Avon Products Inc 2007-2011 in (%)
Figure 5.13: APAC market share trend Vs Nexans SA Inc. 2007-2011 in (%)
Figure 5.14: ROW market share trend Vs Nexans SA Inc. 2007-2011 in (%)
Figure 5.15: Avon Products Inc trend in R&D expenses 2007-2011 in (%)
Figure 5.16: Avon Products Inc tremd R&D expenses percentage of total sales in (US $B)
Figure 5.17: Comparison of Avon Products Inc R&D expenditure vs top three & top five players average 2011
Figure 5.18: Avon Products Inc productivity 2007-2011 (US $M)
Figure 5.19: Avon Products Inc fixed asset value 2007-2011 (US $M)
Figure 5.20: Strategic execution
Chapter 6. Company Profile of L’Oreal S.A.
Figure 6.1: L’Oreal S.A. revenue by business structure 2011
Figure 6.2: Lucintel triad - L’Oreal S.A.
Figure 6.3: Financial benchmarking of L’Oreal S.A. against top three and top five industry players’ average
Figure 6.4: Financial benchmarking of L’Oreal S.A. against Top five best
Figure 6.5: Global industry revenue trend Vs L’Oreal S.A. (2007-2011) in (US $B)
Figure 6.6: Global market share trend for L’Oreal S.A. (2007-2011) in (%)
Figure 6.7: North American industry revenue trend Vs. L’Oreal S.A. 2007-2011 in (US $B)
Figure 6.8: European industry revenue trend Vs L’Oreal S.A. 2007-2011 in (US $B)
Figure 6.9: APAC industry revenue trend Vs L’Oreal S.A. 2007-2011 in (US $B)
Figure 6.10: ROW industry revenue trend Vs L’Oreal S.A. 2007-2011 in (US $B)
Figure 6.11: North American market share trend Vs L’Oreal S.A. 2007-2011 in (%)
Figure 6.12: European market share trend Vs L’Oreal S.A. 2007-2011 in (%)
Figure 6.13: APAC market share trend Vs L’Oreal S.A. 2007-2011 in (%)
Figure 6.14: ROW market share trend Vs L’Oreal S.A. 2007-2011 in (%)
Figure 6.15: L’Oreal S.A. trend in R&D expenses 2007-2011 in US $B
Figure 6.16: L’Oreal S.A. trend in R&D expenses percentage of total sales (%)
Figure 6.17: Comparison of L’Oreal S.A. R&D expenditure vs top three & top five players average 2011
Figure 6.18: L’Oreal S.A. productivity 2007-2011 in (US $M)
Figure 6.19: L’Oreal S.A. fixed asset value 2007-2011 in (US $M)
Figure 6.20: Strategic execution
Chapter 7. Company Profile of The Estee Lauder Companies Inc.
Figure 7.1: The Estee Lauder Companies Inc. revenue by business structure 2011
Figure 7.2: Lucintel triad –The Estee Lauder Companies Inc.
Figure 7.3: Financial benchmarking of The Estee Lauder Companies Inc. against top three and top five industry players’ average
Figure 7.4: Financial benchmarking of The Estee Lauder Companies Inc. against Top five best
Figure 7.5: Global industry revenue trend Vs The Estee Lauder Companies Inc. (2007-2011) in (US $B)
Figure 7.6: Global market share trend for The Estee Lauder Companies Inc. (2007-2011) in (%)
Figure 7.7: North American industry revenue trend Vs The Estee Lauder Companies Inc. (2007-2011) in (US $B)
Figure 7.8: European industry revenue trend Vs The Estee Lauder Companies Inc. (2007-2011) in (US $B)
Figure 7.9: APAC industry revenue trend Vs The Estee Lauder Companies Inc. (2007-2011) in (US $B)
Figure 7.10: ROW industry revenue trend Vs The Estee Lauder Companies Inc. (2007-2011) in (US $B)
Figure 7.11: North American market share trend Vs The Estee Lauder Companies Inc. (2007-2011) in (%)
Figure 7.12: European market share trend Vs The Estee Lauder Companies Inc. (2007-2011) in (%)
Figure 7.13: APAC market share trend Vs The Estee Lauder Companies Inc. (2007-2011) in (%)
Figure 7.14: ROW market share trend Vs The Estee Lauder Companies Inc. (2007-2011) in (%)
Figure 7.15: The Estee Lauder Companies Inc. trend in R&D expenses 2007-2011 in US $B
Figure 7.16: The Estee Lauder Companies Inc. trend in R&D expenses percentage of total sales (%)
Figure 7.17: Comparison of The Estee Lauder Companies Inc. R&D expenditure vs top three & top five players average 2011
Figure 7.18: The Estee Lauder Companies Inc. productivity 2007-2011 in (US $M)
Figure 7.19: Prysmian SPA fixed asset value 2007-2011 in (US $M)
Figure 7.20: Strategic execution
Chapter 8. Company Profile of Procter & Gamble
Figure 8.1: Procter & Gamble revenue by business structure 2011
Figure 8.2: Lucintel triad –Procter & Gamble
Figure 8.3: Financial benchmarking of Procter & Gamble against top three and top five industry players’ average
Figure 8.4: Financial benchmarking of Procter & Gamble against Top five best
Figure 8.5: Global industry revenue trend Vs Procter & Gamble (2007-2011) in (US $B)
Figure 8.6: Global market share trend for Procter & Gamble (2007-2011) in (%)
Figure 8.7: North American industry revenue trend Vs Procter & Gamble (2007-2011) in (US $B)
Figure 8.8: European industry revenue trend Vs Procter & Gamble (2007-2011) in (US $B)
Figure 8.9: APAC industry revenue trend Vs Procter & Gamble (2007-2011) in (US $B)
Figure 8.10: ROW industry revenue trend Vs Procter & Gamble (2007-2011) in (US $B)
Figure 8.11: North American market share trend Vs Procter & Gamble (2007-2011) in (%)
Figure 8.12: European market share trend Vs Procter & Gamble (2007-2011) in (%)
Figure 8.13: APAC market share trend Vs Procter & Gamble (2007-2011) in (%)
Figure 8.14: ROW market share trend Vs Procter & Gamble (2007-2011) in (%)
Figure 8.15: Procter & Gamble trend in R&D expenses 2007-2011 in US $B
Figure 8.16: Procter & Gamble trend in R&D expenses percentage of total sales (%)
Figure 8.17: Comparison of Procter & Gamble R&D expenditure vs top three & top five players average 2011
Figure 8.18: Procter & Gamble productivity 2007-2011 in (US $M)
Figure 8.19: Procter & Gamble fixed asset value 2007-2011 in (US $M)
Figure 8.20: Strategic execution
Chapter 9. Company Profile of Unilever PLC
Figure 9.1: Unilever PLC revenue by business structure 2011
Figure 9.2: Lucintel triad –Unilever PLC
Figure 9.3: Financial benchmarking of Unilever PLC against top three and top five industry players’ average
Figure 9.4: Financial benchmarking of Unilever PLC against Top five best
Figure 9.5: Global industry revenue trend Vs Unilever PLC (2007-2011) in (US $B)
Figure 9.6: Global market share trend for Unilever PLC (2007-2011) in (%)
Figure 9.7: North American industry revenue trend Vs Unilever PLC (2007-2011) in (US $B)
Figure 9.8: European industry revenue trend Vs Unilever PLC (2007-2011) in (US $B)
Figure 9.9: APAC industry revenue trend Vs Unilever PLC (2007-2011) in (US $B)
Figure 9.10: ROW industry revenue trend Vs Unilever PLC (2007-2011) in (US $B)
Figure 9.11: North American market share trend Vs Unilever PLC (2007-2011) in (%)
Figure 9.12: European market share trend Vs (Unilever PLC 2007-2011) in (%)
Figure 9.13: APAC market share trend Vs Unilever PLC (2007-2011) in (%)
Figure 9.14: ROW market share trend Vs Unilever PLC (2007-2011) in (%)
Figure 9.15: Unilever PLC trend in R&D expenses 2007-2011 in US $B
Figure 9.16: Unilever PLC trend in R&D expenses percentage of total sales
Figure 9.17: Comparison of Unilever PLC R&D expenditure vs top three & top five players average 2011
Figure 9.18: Unilever PLC productivity 2007-2011 in (US $M)
Figure 9.19: Unilever PLC fixed asset value 2007-2011 in (US $M)
Figure 9.20: Strategic execution
List of Tables
Chapter 3. Market Opportunity
Table 3.1: Industry parameters of global beauty care products industry
Table 3.2: Relative market attractiveness by region
Table 3.3: Regional revenue growth rate
Table 3.4: Segment revenue growth rate
Chapter 4. Competitive Benchmarking (Financial and Market)
Table 4.1: Financial benchmarking of top five global beauty care products manufacturers
Table 4.2: Key financial parameters for top five global beauty care products manufacturers
Table 4.3: Regional revenue (US $B)
Table 4.4: Regional revenue (%)
Table 4.5: Competitors based on markets served
Table 4.6: Lucintel triad - Top five major players
Chapter 5. Company Profile of Avon Products Inc.
Table 5.1: Market served –Avon Products Inc.
Table 5.2: Lucintel triad –. Avon Products Inc.
Table 5.3: Financial Benchmarking of Avon Products Inc. against best and against Top three and Top five industry players’ average
Table 5.4: Strategic execution – product positioning by segment
Table 5.5: Strategic execution – perceived customer value / quality
Table 5.6: Strategic execution – promotion / communications
Table 5.7: Strategic execution – product distribution by region
Chapter 6. Company Profile of L’Oreal S.A.
Table 6.1: Market served –L’Oreal S.A.
Table 6.2: Lucintel triad –L’Oreal S.A.
Table 6.3: Financial benchmarking of L’Oreal S.A. against best and against Top three and Top five industry players average
Table 6.4: Strategic execution – product positioning by segment
Table 6.5: Strategic execution – perceived customer value / quality
Table 6.6: Strategic execution – promotion / communications
Table 6.7: Strategic execution – product distribution by region
Chapter 7. Company Profile of The Estee Lauder Companies Inc.
Table 7.1: Market served – Prysmian SPA
Table 7.2: Lucintel triad –The Estee Lauder Companies Inc.
Table 7.3: Financial benchmarking of The Estee Lauder Companies Inc against best and against Top three and Top five industry players’ average
Table 7.4: Strategic execution – product positioning by segment
Table 7.5: Strategic execution – perceived customer value / quality
Table 7.6: Strategic execution – promotion / communications
Table 7.7: Strategic execution – product distribution by region
Chapter 8. Company Profile of Procter & Gamble
Table 8.1: Market served –Procter & Gamble
Table 8.2: Lucintel triad – Procter & Gamble
Table 8.3: Financial Benchmarking of Procter & Gamble against best and against Top three and top five industry players’ average
Table 8.4: Strategic execution – product positioning by segment
Table 8.5: Strategic execution – perceived customer value / quality
Table 8.6: Strategic execution – promotion / communications
Table 8.7: Strategic execution – product distribution by region
Chapter 9. Company Profile of Unilever PLC
Table 9.1: Markets Served –Unilever PLC
Table 9.2: Lucintel triad –Unilever PLC
Table 9.3: Financial Benchmarking of Unilever PLC against best and against Top three and top five industry players’ average
Table 9.4: Strategic execution – product positioning by segment
Table 9.5: Strategic execution – perceived customer value / quality
Table 9.6: Strategic execution – promotion / communications
Table 9.7: Strategic execution – product distribution by region
Table of Contents
1. Executive Summary
2. Market Definition and Scope
3. Market Opportunity
4. Competitive Benchmarking (Financial and Market)
5. Company Profile
-
Company Overview
-
Benchmarking (Financial & Market)
-
SWOT Analysis
-
Product Positioning
-
Marketing Strategy and Tactics
-
Corporate Strategy
List of Figures
Chapter 3. Market Opportunity
Figure 3.1: Supply beauty care products Industry
Figure 3.2: Global beauty care products Industry annual trend 2006-2011 (US $B)
Figure 3.3: Global beauty care products Industry regional trend 2006-2011 (US $B)
Figure 3.4: Global beauty care products Industry regional trend 2006-2011 (%)
Figure 3.5: Global beauty care products Industry segment trend 2006-2011 (US $B)
Figure 3.6: Global beauty care products Industry segment trend 2006-2011 (%)
Figure 3.7: Global beauty care products Industry opportunity by region
Figure 3.8: Global beauty care products Industry opportunity by segment
Chapter 4.Competitive Benchmarking (Financial and Market)
Figure 4.1: top five global beauty care products manufacturers – financial benchmarking
Figure 4.2: Global beauty care products manufacturers gross profit and net profit analysis – 2011
Figure 4.3: Financial analysis – growth leadership quadrant (2011)
Figure 4.4: Market share of top players 2006
Figure 4.5: Market share of top players 2011
Figure 4.6: 2006 Market share analysis
Figure 4.7: 2011 Market share analysis
Figure 4.8: Global market share analysis 2011
Figure 4.9: Global market fragmentation 2011
Figure 4.10: Market value North America (US $B)
Figure 4.11: Market value Europe (US $B)
Figure 4.12: Market value Asia Pacific (US $B)
Figure 4.13: Market value ROW (US $B)
Figure 4.14: Regional revenue evaluation 2011 (US $M)
Figure 4.15: Regional revenue evaluation 2011 (%)
Figure 4.16: North American revenue trend for top players 2007-2011 (US $B)
Figure 4.17: Europe revenue trend for top players 2007-2011 (US $B)
Figure 4.18: Asia Pacific revenue trend for top players 2007-2011 (US $B)
Figure 4.19: Row revenue trend for top players 2007-2011 (US $B)
Figure 4.20: Lucintel triad - top five major players
Chapter 5. Company Profile of Avon Products Inc
Figure 5.1: Avon Products Inc.’s revenue by business structure 2011
Figure 5.2: Lucintel Triad –Avon Products Inc
Figure 5.3: Financial benchmarking. Avon Products Inc against top three and top five industry players’ average
Figure 5.4: Financial benchmarking of Avon Products Inc. against Top Five best
Figure 5.5: Global industry revenue trend Vs Avon Products Inc (2007-2011) in US $B
Figure 5.6: Global market share trend for Avon Products Inc (2007-2011) in (%)
Figure 5.7: North American industry revenue trend Vs Avon Products Inc 2007-2011 in (US $B)
Figure 5.8: European industry revenue trend Vs Avon Products Inc 2007-2011 in (US $B)
Figure 5.9: APAC industry revenue trend Vs Avon Products Inc 2007-2011 in (US $B)
Figure 5.10: ROW industry revenue trend Vs Avon Products Inc 2007-2011 in (US $B)
Figure 5.11: North American market share trend Vs. Avon Products Inc 2007-2011 in (%)
Figure 5.12: European market share trend Vs Avon Products Inc 2007-2011 in (%)
Figure 5.13: APAC market share trend Vs Nexans SA Inc. 2007-2011 in (%)
Figure 5.14: ROW market share trend Vs Nexans SA Inc. 2007-2011 in (%)
Figure 5.15: Avon Products Inc trend in R&D expenses 2007-2011 in (%)
Figure 5.16: Avon Products Inc tremd R&D expenses percentage of total sales in (US $B)
Figure 5.17: Comparison of Avon Products Inc R&D expenditure vs top three & top five players average 2011
Figure 5.18: Avon Products Inc productivity 2007-2011 (US $M)
Figure 5.19: Avon Products Inc fixed asset value 2007-2011 (US $M)
Figure 5.20: Strategic execution
Chapter 6. Company Profile of L’Oreal S.A.
Figure 6.1: L’Oreal S.A. revenue by business structure 2011
Figure 6.2: Lucintel triad - L’Oreal S.A.
Figure 6.3: Financial benchmarking of L’Oreal S.A. against top three and top five industry players’ average
Figure 6.4: Financial benchmarking of L’Oreal S.A. against Top five best
Figure 6.5: Global industry revenue trend Vs L’Oreal S.A. (2007-2011) in (US $B)
Figure 6.6: Global market share trend for L’Oreal S.A. (2007-2011) in (%)
Figure 6.7: North American industry revenue trend Vs. L’Oreal S.A. 2007-2011 in (US $B)
Figure 6.8: European industry revenue trend Vs L’Oreal S.A. 2007-2011 in (US $B)
Figure 6.9: APAC industry revenue trend Vs L’Oreal S.A. 2007-2011 in (US $B)
Figure 6.10: ROW industry revenue trend Vs L’Oreal S.A. 2007-2011 in (US $B)
Figure 6.11: North American market share trend Vs L’Oreal S.A. 2007-2011 in (%)
Figure 6.12: European market share trend Vs L’Oreal S.A. 2007-2011 in (%)
Figure 6.13: APAC market share trend Vs L’Oreal S.A. 2007-2011 in (%)
Figure 6.14: ROW market share trend Vs L’Oreal S.A. 2007-2011 in (%)
Figure 6.15: L’Oreal S.A. trend in R&D expenses 2007-2011 in US $B
Figure 6.16: L’Oreal S.A. trend in R&D expenses percentage of total sales (%)
Figure 6.17: Comparison of L’Oreal S.A. R&D expenditure vs top three & top five players average 2011
Figure 6.18: L’Oreal S.A. productivity 2007-2011 in (US $M)
Figure 6.19: L’Oreal S.A. fixed asset value 2007-2011 in (US $M)
Figure 6.20: Strategic execution
Chapter 7. Company Profile of The Estee Lauder Companies Inc.
Figure 7.1: The Estee Lauder Companies Inc. revenue by business structure 2011
Figure 7.2: Lucintel triad –The Estee Lauder Companies Inc.
Figure 7.3: Financial benchmarking of The Estee Lauder Companies Inc. against top three and top five industry players’ average
Figure 7.4: Financial benchmarking of The Estee Lauder Companies Inc. against Top five best
Figure 7.5: Global industry revenue trend Vs The Estee Lauder Companies Inc. (2007-2011) in (US $B)
Figure 7.6: Global market share trend for The Estee Lauder Companies Inc. (2007-2011) in (%)
Figure 7.7: North American industry revenue trend Vs The Estee Lauder Companies Inc. (2007-2011) in (US $B)
Figure 7.8: European industry revenue trend Vs The Estee Lauder Companies Inc. (2007-2011) in (US $B)
Figure 7.9: APAC industry revenue trend Vs The Estee Lauder Companies Inc. (2007-2011) in (US $B)
Figure 7.10: ROW industry revenue trend Vs The Estee Lauder Companies Inc. (2007-2011) in (US $B)
Figure 7.11: North American market share trend Vs The Estee Lauder Companies Inc. (2007-2011) in (%)
Figure 7.12: European market share trend Vs The Estee Lauder Companies Inc. (2007-2011) in (%)
Figure 7.13: APAC market share trend Vs The Estee Lauder Companies Inc. (2007-2011) in (%)
Figure 7.14: ROW market share trend Vs The Estee Lauder Companies Inc. (2007-2011) in (%)
Figure 7.15: The Estee Lauder Companies Inc. trend in R&D expenses 2007-2011 in US $B
Figure 7.16: The Estee Lauder Companies Inc. trend in R&D expenses percentage of total sales (%)
Figure 7.17: Comparison of The Estee Lauder Companies Inc. R&D expenditure vs top three & top five players average 2011
Figure 7.18: The Estee Lauder Companies Inc. productivity 2007-2011 in (US $M)
Figure 7.19: Prysmian SPA fixed asset value 2007-2011 in (US $M)
Figure 7.20: Strategic execution
Chapter 8. Company Profile of Procter & Gamble
Figure 8.1: Procter & Gamble revenue by business structure 2011
Figure 8.2: Lucintel triad –Procter & Gamble
Figure 8.3: Financial benchmarking of Procter & Gamble against top three and top five industry players’ average
Figure 8.4: Financial benchmarking of Procter & Gamble against Top five best
Figure 8.5: Global industry revenue trend Vs Procter & Gamble (2007-2011) in (US $B)
Figure 8.6: Global market share trend for Procter & Gamble (2007-2011) in (%)
Figure 8.7: North American industry revenue trend Vs Procter & Gamble (2007-2011) in (US $B)
Figure 8.8: European industry revenue trend Vs Procter & Gamble (2007-2011) in (US $B)
Figure 8.9: APAC industry revenue trend Vs Procter & Gamble (2007-2011) in (US $B)
Figure 8.10: ROW industry revenue trend Vs Procter & Gamble (2007-2011) in (US $B)
Figure 8.11: North American market share trend Vs Procter & Gamble (2007-2011) in (%)
Figure 8.12: European market share trend Vs Procter & Gamble (2007-2011) in (%)
Figure 8.13: APAC market share trend Vs Procter & Gamble (2007-2011) in (%)
Figure 8.14: ROW market share trend Vs Procter & Gamble (2007-2011) in (%)
Figure 8.15: Procter & Gamble trend in R&D expenses 2007-2011 in US $B
Figure 8.16: Procter & Gamble trend in R&D expenses percentage of total sales (%)
Figure 8.17: Comparison of Procter & Gamble R&D expenditure vs top three & top five players average 2011
Figure 8.18: Procter & Gamble productivity 2007-2011 in (US $M)
Figure 8.19: Procter & Gamble fixed asset value 2007-2011 in (US $M)
Figure 8.20: Strategic execution
Chapter 9. Company Profile of Unilever PLC
Figure 9.1: Unilever PLC revenue by business structure 2011
Figure 9.2: Lucintel triad –Unilever PLC
Figure 9.3: Financial benchmarking of Unilever PLC against top three and top five industry players’ average
Figure 9.4: Financial benchmarking of Unilever PLC against Top five best
Figure 9.5: Global industry revenue trend Vs Unilever PLC (2007-2011) in (US $B)
Figure 9.6: Global market share trend for Unilever PLC (2007-2011) in (%)
Figure 9.7: North American industry revenue trend Vs Unilever PLC (2007-2011) in (US $B)
Figure 9.8: European industry revenue trend Vs Unilever PLC (2007-2011) in (US $B)
Figure 9.9: APAC industry revenue trend Vs Unilever PLC (2007-2011) in (US $B)
Figure 9.10: ROW industry revenue trend Vs Unilever PLC (2007-2011) in (US $B)
Figure 9.11: North American market share trend Vs Unilever PLC (2007-2011) in (%)
Figure 9.12: European market share trend Vs (Unilever PLC 2007-2011) in (%)
Figure 9.13: APAC market share trend Vs Unilever PLC (2007-2011) in (%)
Figure 9.14: ROW market share trend Vs Unilever PLC (2007-2011) in (%)
Figure 9.15: Unilever PLC trend in R&D expenses 2007-2011 in US $B
Figure 9.16: Unilever PLC trend in R&D expenses percentage of total sales
Figure 9.17: Comparison of Unilever PLC R&D expenditure vs top three & top five players average 2011
Figure 9.18: Unilever PLC productivity 2007-2011 in (US $M)
Figure 9.19: Unilever PLC fixed asset value 2007-2011 in (US $M)
Figure 9.20: Strategic execution
List of Tables
Chapter 3. Market Opportunity
Table 3.1: Industry parameters of global beauty care products industry
Table 3.2: Relative market attractiveness by region
Table 3.3: Regional revenue growth rate
Table 3.4: Segment revenue growth rate
Chapter 4. Competitive Benchmarking (Financial and Market)
Table 4.1: Financial benchmarking of top five global beauty care products manufacturers
Table 4.2: Key financial parameters for top five global beauty care products manufacturers
Table 4.3: Regional revenue (US $B)
Table 4.4: Regional revenue (%)
Table 4.5: Competitors based on markets served
Table 4.6: Lucintel triad - Top five major players
Chapter 5. Company Profile of Avon Products Inc.
Table 5.1: Market served –Avon Products Inc.
Table 5.2: Lucintel triad –. Avon Products Inc.
Table 5.3: Financial Benchmarking of Avon Products Inc. against best and against Top three and Top five industry players’ average
Table 5.4: Strategic execution – product positioning by segment
Table 5.5: Strategic execution – perceived customer value / quality
Table 5.6: Strategic execution – promotion / communications
Table 5.7: Strategic execution – product distribution by region
Chapter 6. Company Profile of L’Oreal S.A.
Table 6.1: Market served –L’Oreal S.A.
Table 6.2: Lucintel triad –L’Oreal S.A.
Table 6.3: Financial benchmarking of L’Oreal S.A. against best and against Top three and Top five industry players average
Table 6.4: Strategic execution – product positioning by segment
Table 6.5: Strategic execution – perceived customer value / quality
Table 6.6: Strategic execution – promotion / communications
Table 6.7: Strategic execution – product distribution by region
Chapter 7. Company Profile of The Estee Lauder Companies Inc.
Table 7.1: Market served – Prysmian SPA
Table 7.2: Lucintel triad –The Estee Lauder Companies Inc.
Table 7.3: Financial benchmarking of The Estee Lauder Companies Inc against best and against Top three and Top five industry players’ average
Table 7.4: Strategic execution – product positioning by segment
Table 7.5: Strategic execution – perceived customer value / quality
Table 7.6: Strategic execution – promotion / communications
Table 7.7: Strategic execution – product distribution by region
Chapter 8. Company Profile of Procter & Gamble
Table 8.1: Market served –Procter & Gamble
Table 8.2: Lucintel triad – Procter & Gamble
Table 8.3: Financial Benchmarking of Procter & Gamble against best and against Top three and top five industry players’ average
Table 8.4: Strategic execution – product positioning by segment
Table 8.5: Strategic execution – perceived customer value / quality
Table 8.6: Strategic execution – promotion / communications
Table 8.7: Strategic execution – product distribution by region
Chapter 9. Company Profile of Unilever PLC
Table 9.1: Markets Served –Unilever PLC
Table 9.2: Lucintel triad –Unilever PLC
Table 9.3: Financial Benchmarking of Unilever PLC against best and against Top three and top five industry players’ average
Table 9.4: Strategic execution – product positioning by segment
Table 9.5: Strategic execution – perceived customer value / quality
Table 9.6: Strategic execution – promotion / communications
Table 9.7: Strategic execution – product distribution by region