Table of Contents
1. Executive Summary
2. Market Definition and Scope
3. Market Opportunity
4. Competitive Benchmarking (Financial and Market)
-
Company Overview
-
Benchmarking (Financial & Market)
-
SWOT Analysis
-
Product Positioning
-
Marketing Strategy and Tactics
-
Corporate Strategy
List of Figures
Chapter 3. Market Opportunity
Figure 3.1: Supply chain for hair care product manufacturers market
Figure 3.2: Global hair care product manufacturers industry annual trend 2007-2012 (US $B)
Figure 3.3: Global hair care product manufacturers industry regional trend 2007-2012 (US $B)
Figure 3.4: Global hair care product manufacturers industry regional trend 2007-2012 (%)
Figure 3.5: Global hair care product manufacturers industry segment trend 2007-2012 (US $B)
Figure 3.6: Global hair care product manufacturers industry segment trend 2007-2012 (US $B)
Figure 3.7: Global hair care product manufacturers industry opportunity by region
Figure 3.8: Global hair care product manufacturers industry opportunity by segment
Chapter 4.Competitive Benchmarking (Financial and Market)
Figure 4.1: Top five hair care product manufacturers companies – financial benchmarking
Figure 4.2: Global top five hair care product manufacturers companies gross profit and net profit analysis – 2012
Figure 4.3: Financial analysis – growth leadership quadrant (2012)
Figure 4.4: Market share of top players 2007
Figure 4.5: Market share of top players 2012
Figure 4.6: 2007 Market share analysis
Figure 4.7: 2011 Market share analysis
Figure 4.8: Global market share analysis 2012
Figure 4.9: Global market fragmentation 2012
Figure 4.10: Market value North America (US $B)
Figure 4.11: Market value Europe (US $B)
Figure 4.12: Market value Asia Pacific (US $B)
Figure 4.13: Market value ROW (US $B)
Figure 4.14: Regional revenue evaluation 2012 (US $M)
Figure 4.15: Regional revenue evaluation 2012 (%)
Figure 4.16: North American revenue trend for top players 2008-2012 (US $B)
Figure 4.17: Europe revenue trend for top players 2008-2012 (US $B)
Figure 4.18: Asia Pacific revenue trend for top players 2008-2012 (US $B)
Figure 4.19: Row revenue trend for top players 2008-2012 (US $B)
Figure 4.20: Lucintel triad - top five major players
Chapter 5. Company Profile of Colgate-Palmolive
Figure 5.1: Colgate-Palmolive’s revenue by business structure 2011
Figure 5.2: Lucintel Triad – Colgate-Palmolive
Figure 5.3: Financial benchmarking Colgate-Palmolive against top three and top five industry players’ average
Figure 5.4: Financial benchmarking of Colgate-Palmolive against Top Five best
Figure 5.5: Global industry revenue trend Vs Colgate-Palmolive (2008-2012) in US $B
Figure 5.6: Global market share trend for Colgate-Palmolive (2008-2012) in (%)
Figure 5.7: North American industry revenue trend Vs Colgate-Palmolive 2008-2012 in (US $B)
Figure 5.8: European industry revenue trend Vs Colgate-Palmolive 2008-2012 in (US $B)
Figure 5.9: APAC industry revenue trend Vs Colgate-Palmolive 2008-2012 in (US $B)
Figure 5.10: ROW industry revenue trend Vs Colgate-Palmolive 2008-2012 in (US $B)
Figure 5.11: North American market share trend Vs Colgate-Palmolive 2008-2012 in (%)
Figure 5.12: European market share trend Vs Colgate-Palmolive 2008-2012 in (%)
Figure 5.13: APAC market share trend Vs Colgate-Palmolive 2008-2012 in (%)
Figure 5.14: ROW market share trend Vs Colgate-Palmolive 2008-2012 in (%)
Figure 5.15: Colgate-Palmolive trend in R&D expenses 2008-2012 in US $M
Figure 5.16: Colgate-Palmolive trend in R&D expenses percentage of total revenue
Figure 5.17: Comparison of Colgate-Palmolive R&D expenditure Vs top three & top five players average 2011
Figure 5.18: Colgate-Palmolive productivity 2007-2011 (US $M)
Figure 5.19: Colgate-Palmolive fixed asset value 2007-2011 (US $M)
Figure 5.20: Strategic execution
Chapter 6. Company Profile of Henkel AG & Co KGaA
Figure 6.1: Henkel AG & Co KGaA revenue by business structure 2011
Figure 6.2: Lucintel triad - Henkel AG & Co KGaA
Figure 6.3: Financial benchmarking of Henkel AG & Co KGaA against top three and top five industry players’ average
Figure 6.4: Financial benchmarking of Henkel AG & Co KGaA against Top five best
Figure 6.5: Global industry revenue trend Vs Henkel AG & Co KGaA (2008-2012) in (US $B)
Figure 6.6: Global market share trend for Henkel AG & Co KGaA (2008-2012) in (%)
Figure 6.7: North American industry revenue trend Vs. Henkel AG & Co KGaA 2008-2012 in (US $B)
Figure 6.8: European industry revenue trend Vs Henkel AG & Co KGaA 2008-2012 in (US $B)
Figure 6.9: APAC industry revenue trend Vs Henkel AG & Co KGaA 2008-2012 in (US $B)
Figure 6.10: ROW industry revenue trend Vs Henkel AG & Co KGaA 2008-2012 in (US $B)
Figure 6.11: North American market share trend Vs Henkel AG & Co KGaA 2008-2012 in (%)
Figure 6.12: European market share trend Vs Henkel AG & Co KGaA 2008-2012 in (%)
Figure 6.13: APAC market share trend Vs Henkel AG & Co KGaA 2008-2012 in (%)
Figure 6.14: ROW market share trend Vs Henkel AG & Co KGaA 2008-2012 in (%)
Figure 6.15: Henkel AG & Co KGaA trend in R&D expenses 2007-2011 in US $B
Figure 6.16: Henkel AG & Co KGaA trend in R&D expenses Percentage of totalrevenue
Figure 6.17: Comparison of Henkel AG & Co KGaA R&D expenditure Vs top three & top five players average 2011
Figure 6.18: Henkel AG & Co KGaA productivity 2007-2011 in (US $M)
Figure 6.19: Henkel AG & Co KGaA fixed asset value 2007-2011 in (US $M)
Figure 6.20: Strategic execution
Chapter 7. Company Profile of L’Oreal S.A.
Figure 7.1: L’Oreal S.A. revenue by business structure 2011
Figure 7.2: Lucintel triad – L’Oreal S.A.
Figure 7.3: Financial benchmarking of L’Oreal S.A. against top three and top five industry players’ average
Figure 7.4: Financial benchmarking of L’Oreal S.A. against Top five best
Figure 7.5: Global industry revenue trend Vs L’Oreal S.A. (2008-2012) in (US $B)
Figure 7.6: Global market share trend for L’Oreal S.A. (2008-2012) in (%)
Figure 7.7: North American industry revenue trend Vs L’Oreal S.A. (2008-2012) in (US $B)
Figure 7.8: European industry revenue trend Vs L’Oreal S.A. (2008-2012) in (US $B)
Figure 7.9: APAC industry revenue trend Vs L’Oreal S.A. (2008-2012) in (US $B)
Figure 7.10: ROW industry revenue trend Vs L’Oreal S.A. (2008-2012) in (US $B)
Figure 7.11: North American market share trend Vs L’Oreal S.A. (2008-2012) in (%)
Figure 7.12: European market share trend Vs L’Oreal S.A. l (2008-2012) in (%)
Figure 7.13: APAC market share trend Vs L’Oreal S.A. (2008-2012) in (%)
Figure 7.14: ROW market share trend Vs L’Oreal S.A. (2008-2012) in (%)
Figure 7.15: L’Oreal S.A. trend in R&D expenses 2008-2012 in US $M
Figure 7.16: L’Oreal S.A. trend in R&D expenses Percentage of total revenue
Figure 7.17: Comparison of L’Oreal S.A. R&D expenditure Vs top three & top five players average 2011
Figure 7.18: L’Oreal S.A.productivity 2007-2011 in (US $M)
Figure 7.19: L’Oreal S.A.fixed asset value 2007-2011 in (US $M)
Figure 7.20: Strategic execution
Chapter 8. Company Profile of The Procter & Gamble Company
Figure 8.1: The Procter & Gamble Company revenue by business structure 2011
Figure 8.2: Lucintel triad – The Procter & Gamble Company
Figure 8.3: Financial benchmarking of The Procter & Gamble Company against top three and top five industry players’ average
Figure 8.4: Financial benchmarking of The Procter & Gamble Company against Top five best
Figure 8.5: Global industry revenue trend Vs The Procter & Gamble Company (2008-2012) in (US $B)
Figure 8.6: Global market share trend for The Procter & Gamble Company (2008-2012) in (%)
Figure 8.7: North American industry revenue trend Vs The Procter & Gamble Company (2008-2012) in (US $B)
Figure 8.8: European industry revenue trend Vs The Procter & Gamble Company (2008-2012) in (US $B)
Figure 8.9: APAC industry revenue trend Vs The Procter & Gamble Company (2008-2012) in (US $B)
Figure 8.10: ROW industry revenue trend Vs The Procter & Gamble Company (2008-2012) in (US $B)
Figure 8.11: North American market share trend Vs The Procter & Gamble Company (2008-2012) in (%)
Figure 8.12: European market share trend Vs The Procter & Gamble Company (2008-2012) in (%)
Figure 8.13: APAC market share trend Vs The Procter & Gamble Company (2008-2012) in (%)
Figure 8.14: ROW market share trend Vs The Procter & Gamble Company (2008-2012) in (%)
Figure 8.15: The Procter & Gamble Company trend in R&D expenses 2008-2012 in US $M
Figure 8.16: The Procter & Gamble Company trend in R&D expenses percentage of totalrevenue
Figure 8.17: Comparison of The Procter & Gamble Company R&D expenditure Vs top three & top five players average 2011
Figure 8.18: The Procter & Gamble Company productivity 2007-2011 in (US $M)
Figure 8.19: The Procter & Gamble Company fixed asset value 2007-2011 in (US $M)
Figure 8.20: Strategic execution
Chapter 9. Company Profile of Unilever PLC
Figure 9.1: Unilever PLC revenue by business structure 2011
Figure 9.2: Lucintel triad – Unilever PLC
Figure 9.3: Financial benchmarking of Unilever PLC against top three and top five industry players’ average
Figure 9.4: Financial benchmarking of Unilever PLC against Top five best
Figure 9.5: Global industry revenue trend Vs Unilever PLC (2008-2012) in (US $B)
Figure 9.6: Global market share trend for Unilever PLC (2008-2012) in (%)
Figure 9.7: North American industry revenue trend Vs Unilever PLC (2008-2012) in (US $B)
Figure 9.8: European industry revenue trend Vs Unilever PLC (2008-2012) in (US $B)
Figure 9.9: APAC industry revenue trend Vs Unilever PLC (2008-2012) in (US $B)
Figure 9.10: ROW industry revenue trend Vs Unilever PLC (2008-2012) in (US $B)
Figure 9.11: North American market share trend Vs Unilever PLC (2008-2012) in (%)
Figure 9.12: European market share trend Vs Unilever PLC (2008-2012) in (%)
Figure 9.13: APAC market share trend Vs Unilever PLC (2008-2012) in (%)
Figure 9.14: ROW market share trend Vs Unilever PLC (2008-2012) in (%)
Figure 9.15: Unilever PLC trend in R&D expenses 2008-2012 in US $M
Figure 9.16: Unilever PLC trend in R&D expenses percentage of total revenue
Figure 9.17: Comparison of Unilever PLC R&D expenditure Vs top three & top five players average 2011
Figure 9.18: Unilever PLC productivity 2007-2011 in (US $M)
Figure 9.19: Unilever PLC fixed asset value 2007-2011 in (US $M)
Figure 9.20: Strategic execution
List of Tables
Chapter 3. Market Opportunity
Table 3.1: Industry parameters of global hair care product manufacturers industry
Table 3.2: Relative market attractiveness by region
Table 3.3: Regional revenue growth rate
Table 3.3: Segment revenue growth rate
Chapter 4. Competitive Benchmarking (Financial and Market)
Table 4.1: Financial benchmarking of top five global hair care product manufacturers companies
Table 4.2: Key financial parameters for top five hair care product manufacturers companies
Table 4.3: Regional revenue (US $B)
Table 4.4: Regional revenue (%)
Table 4.5: Competitors based on markets served
Table 4.6: Lucintel triad - Top five major players
Chapter 5. Company Profile of Colgate-Palmolive
Table 5.1: Market served: Colgate-Palmolive
Table 5.2: Lucintel triad – Colgate-Palmolive
Table 5.3: Financial Benchmarking of Colgate-Palmolive against best and against Top three and Top five industry players’ average
Table 5.4: Strategic execution – product positioning by segment
Table 5.5: Strategic execution – perceived customer value / quality
Table 5.6: Strategic execution – promotion / communications
Table 5.7: Strategic execution – product distribution by region
Chapter 6. Company Profile of Henkel AG & Co KGaA
Table 6.1: Market served – Henkel AG & Co KGaA
Table 6.2: Lucintel triad – Henkel AG & Co KGaA
Table 6.3: Financial benchmarking of Henkel AG & Co KGaA against best and against Top three and Top five industry players’ average
Table 6.4: Strategic execution – product positioning by segment
Table 6.5: Strategic execution – perceived customer value / quality
Table 6.6: Strategic execution – promotion / communications
Table 6.7: Strategic execution – product distribution by region
Chapter 7. Company Profile of L’Oreal S.A.
Table 7.1: Market served – L’Oreal S.A.
Table 7.2: Lucintel triad – L’Oreal S.A.
Table 7.3: Financial benchmarking of L’Oreal S.A. against best and against Top three and Top five industry players’ average
Table 7.4: Strategic execution – product positioning by segment
Table 7.5: Strategic execution – perceived customer value / quality
Table 7.6: Strategic execution – promotion / communications
Table 7.7: Strategic execution – product distribution by region
Chapter 8. Company Profile of The Procter & Gamble Company
Table 8.1: Market served – The Procter & Gamble Company
Table 8.2: Lucintel triad – The Procter & Gamble Company
Table 8.3: Financial Benchmarking of The Procter & Gamble Company against best and against Top three and top five industry players’ average
Table 8.4: Strategic execution – product positioning by segment
Table 8.5: Strategic execution – perceived customer value / quality
Table 8.6: Strategic execution – promotion / communications
Table 8.7: Strategic execution – product distribution by region
Chapter 9. Company Profile of Unilever PLC
Table 9.1: Markets Served – Unilever PLC
Table 9.2: Lucintel triad – Unilever PLC
Table 9.3: Financial Benchmarking of Unilever PLC against best and against Top three and top five industry players’ average
Table 9.4: Strategic execution – product positioning by segment
Table 9.5: Strategic execution – perceived customer value / quality
Table 9.6: Strategic execution – promotion / communications
Table 9.7: Strategic execution – product distribution by region
Table of Contents
1. Executive Summary
2. Market Definition and Scope
3. Market Opportunity
4. Competitive Benchmarking (Financial and Market)
-
Company Overview
-
Benchmarking (Financial & Market)
-
SWOT Analysis
-
Product Positioning
-
Marketing Strategy and Tactics
-
Corporate Strategy
List of Figures
Chapter 3. Market Opportunity
Figure 3.1: Supply chain for hair care product manufacturers market
Figure 3.2: Global hair care product manufacturers industry annual trend 2007-2012 (US $B)
Figure 3.3: Global hair care product manufacturers industry regional trend 2007-2012 (US $B)
Figure 3.4: Global hair care product manufacturers industry regional trend 2007-2012 (%)
Figure 3.5: Global hair care product manufacturers industry segment trend 2007-2012 (US $B)
Figure 3.6: Global hair care product manufacturers industry segment trend 2007-2012 (US $B)
Figure 3.7: Global hair care product manufacturers industry opportunity by region
Figure 3.8: Global hair care product manufacturers industry opportunity by segment
Chapter 4.Competitive Benchmarking (Financial and Market)
Figure 4.1: Top five hair care product manufacturers companies – financial benchmarking
Figure 4.2: Global top five hair care product manufacturers companies gross profit and net profit analysis – 2012
Figure 4.3: Financial analysis – growth leadership quadrant (2012)
Figure 4.4: Market share of top players 2007
Figure 4.5: Market share of top players 2012
Figure 4.6: 2007 Market share analysis
Figure 4.7: 2011 Market share analysis
Figure 4.8: Global market share analysis 2012
Figure 4.9: Global market fragmentation 2012
Figure 4.10: Market value North America (US $B)
Figure 4.11: Market value Europe (US $B)
Figure 4.12: Market value Asia Pacific (US $B)
Figure 4.13: Market value ROW (US $B)
Figure 4.14: Regional revenue evaluation 2012 (US $M)
Figure 4.15: Regional revenue evaluation 2012 (%)
Figure 4.16: North American revenue trend for top players 2008-2012 (US $B)
Figure 4.17: Europe revenue trend for top players 2008-2012 (US $B)
Figure 4.18: Asia Pacific revenue trend for top players 2008-2012 (US $B)
Figure 4.19: Row revenue trend for top players 2008-2012 (US $B)
Figure 4.20: Lucintel triad - top five major players
Chapter 5. Company Profile of Colgate-Palmolive
Figure 5.1: Colgate-Palmolive’s revenue by business structure 2011
Figure 5.2: Lucintel Triad – Colgate-Palmolive
Figure 5.3: Financial benchmarking Colgate-Palmolive against top three and top five industry players’ average
Figure 5.4: Financial benchmarking of Colgate-Palmolive against Top Five best
Figure 5.5: Global industry revenue trend Vs Colgate-Palmolive (2008-2012) in US $B
Figure 5.6: Global market share trend for Colgate-Palmolive (2008-2012) in (%)
Figure 5.7: North American industry revenue trend Vs Colgate-Palmolive 2008-2012 in (US $B)
Figure 5.8: European industry revenue trend Vs Colgate-Palmolive 2008-2012 in (US $B)
Figure 5.9: APAC industry revenue trend Vs Colgate-Palmolive 2008-2012 in (US $B)
Figure 5.10: ROW industry revenue trend Vs Colgate-Palmolive 2008-2012 in (US $B)
Figure 5.11: North American market share trend Vs Colgate-Palmolive 2008-2012 in (%)
Figure 5.12: European market share trend Vs Colgate-Palmolive 2008-2012 in (%)
Figure 5.13: APAC market share trend Vs Colgate-Palmolive 2008-2012 in (%)
Figure 5.14: ROW market share trend Vs Colgate-Palmolive 2008-2012 in (%)
Figure 5.15: Colgate-Palmolive trend in R&D expenses 2008-2012 in US $M
Figure 5.16: Colgate-Palmolive trend in R&D expenses percentage of total revenue
Figure 5.17: Comparison of Colgate-Palmolive R&D expenditure Vs top three & top five players average 2011
Figure 5.18: Colgate-Palmolive productivity 2007-2011 (US $M)
Figure 5.19: Colgate-Palmolive fixed asset value 2007-2011 (US $M)
Figure 5.20: Strategic execution
Chapter 6. Company Profile of Henkel AG & Co KGaA
Figure 6.1: Henkel AG & Co KGaA revenue by business structure 2011
Figure 6.2: Lucintel triad - Henkel AG & Co KGaA
Figure 6.3: Financial benchmarking of Henkel AG & Co KGaA against top three and top five industry players’ average
Figure 6.4: Financial benchmarking of Henkel AG & Co KGaA against Top five best
Figure 6.5: Global industry revenue trend Vs Henkel AG & Co KGaA (2008-2012) in (US $B)
Figure 6.6: Global market share trend for Henkel AG & Co KGaA (2008-2012) in (%)
Figure 6.7: North American industry revenue trend Vs. Henkel AG & Co KGaA 2008-2012 in (US $B)
Figure 6.8: European industry revenue trend Vs Henkel AG & Co KGaA 2008-2012 in (US $B)
Figure 6.9: APAC industry revenue trend Vs Henkel AG & Co KGaA 2008-2012 in (US $B)
Figure 6.10: ROW industry revenue trend Vs Henkel AG & Co KGaA 2008-2012 in (US $B)
Figure 6.11: North American market share trend Vs Henkel AG & Co KGaA 2008-2012 in (%)
Figure 6.12: European market share trend Vs Henkel AG & Co KGaA 2008-2012 in (%)
Figure 6.13: APAC market share trend Vs Henkel AG & Co KGaA 2008-2012 in (%)
Figure 6.14: ROW market share trend Vs Henkel AG & Co KGaA 2008-2012 in (%)
Figure 6.15: Henkel AG & Co KGaA trend in R&D expenses 2007-2011 in US $B
Figure 6.16: Henkel AG & Co KGaA trend in R&D expenses Percentage of totalrevenue
Figure 6.17: Comparison of Henkel AG & Co KGaA R&D expenditure Vs top three & top five players average 2011
Figure 6.18: Henkel AG & Co KGaA productivity 2007-2011 in (US $M)
Figure 6.19: Henkel AG & Co KGaA fixed asset value 2007-2011 in (US $M)
Figure 6.20: Strategic execution
Chapter 7. Company Profile of L’Oreal S.A.
Figure 7.1: L’Oreal S.A. revenue by business structure 2011
Figure 7.2: Lucintel triad – L’Oreal S.A.
Figure 7.3: Financial benchmarking of L’Oreal S.A. against top three and top five industry players’ average
Figure 7.4: Financial benchmarking of L’Oreal S.A. against Top five best
Figure 7.5: Global industry revenue trend Vs L’Oreal S.A. (2008-2012) in (US $B)
Figure 7.6: Global market share trend for L’Oreal S.A. (2008-2012) in (%)
Figure 7.7: North American industry revenue trend Vs L’Oreal S.A. (2008-2012) in (US $B)
Figure 7.8: European industry revenue trend Vs L’Oreal S.A. (2008-2012) in (US $B)
Figure 7.9: APAC industry revenue trend Vs L’Oreal S.A. (2008-2012) in (US $B)
Figure 7.10: ROW industry revenue trend Vs L’Oreal S.A. (2008-2012) in (US $B)
Figure 7.11: North American market share trend Vs L’Oreal S.A. (2008-2012) in (%)
Figure 7.12: European market share trend Vs L’Oreal S.A. l (2008-2012) in (%)
Figure 7.13: APAC market share trend Vs L’Oreal S.A. (2008-2012) in (%)
Figure 7.14: ROW market share trend Vs L’Oreal S.A. (2008-2012) in (%)
Figure 7.15: L’Oreal S.A. trend in R&D expenses 2008-2012 in US $M
Figure 7.16: L’Oreal S.A. trend in R&D expenses Percentage of total revenue
Figure 7.17: Comparison of L’Oreal S.A. R&D expenditure Vs top three & top five players average 2011
Figure 7.18: L’Oreal S.A.productivity 2007-2011 in (US $M)
Figure 7.19: L’Oreal S.A.fixed asset value 2007-2011 in (US $M)
Figure 7.20: Strategic execution
Chapter 8. Company Profile of The Procter & Gamble Company
Figure 8.1: The Procter & Gamble Company revenue by business structure 2011
Figure 8.2: Lucintel triad – The Procter & Gamble Company
Figure 8.3: Financial benchmarking of The Procter & Gamble Company against top three and top five industry players’ average
Figure 8.4: Financial benchmarking of The Procter & Gamble Company against Top five best
Figure 8.5: Global industry revenue trend Vs The Procter & Gamble Company (2008-2012) in (US $B)
Figure 8.6: Global market share trend for The Procter & Gamble Company (2008-2012) in (%)
Figure 8.7: North American industry revenue trend Vs The Procter & Gamble Company (2008-2012) in (US $B)
Figure 8.8: European industry revenue trend Vs The Procter & Gamble Company (2008-2012) in (US $B)
Figure 8.9: APAC industry revenue trend Vs The Procter & Gamble Company (2008-2012) in (US $B)
Figure 8.10: ROW industry revenue trend Vs The Procter & Gamble Company (2008-2012) in (US $B)
Figure 8.11: North American market share trend Vs The Procter & Gamble Company (2008-2012) in (%)
Figure 8.12: European market share trend Vs The Procter & Gamble Company (2008-2012) in (%)
Figure 8.13: APAC market share trend Vs The Procter & Gamble Company (2008-2012) in (%)
Figure 8.14: ROW market share trend Vs The Procter & Gamble Company (2008-2012) in (%)
Figure 8.15: The Procter & Gamble Company trend in R&D expenses 2008-2012 in US $M
Figure 8.16: The Procter & Gamble Company trend in R&D expenses percentage of totalrevenue
Figure 8.17: Comparison of The Procter & Gamble Company R&D expenditure Vs top three & top five players average 2011
Figure 8.18: The Procter & Gamble Company productivity 2007-2011 in (US $M)
Figure 8.19: The Procter & Gamble Company fixed asset value 2007-2011 in (US $M)
Figure 8.20: Strategic execution
Chapter 9. Company Profile of Unilever PLC
Figure 9.1: Unilever PLC revenue by business structure 2011
Figure 9.2: Lucintel triad – Unilever PLC
Figure 9.3: Financial benchmarking of Unilever PLC against top three and top five industry players’ average
Figure 9.4: Financial benchmarking of Unilever PLC against Top five best
Figure 9.5: Global industry revenue trend Vs Unilever PLC (2008-2012) in (US $B)
Figure 9.6: Global market share trend for Unilever PLC (2008-2012) in (%)
Figure 9.7: North American industry revenue trend Vs Unilever PLC (2008-2012) in (US $B)
Figure 9.8: European industry revenue trend Vs Unilever PLC (2008-2012) in (US $B)
Figure 9.9: APAC industry revenue trend Vs Unilever PLC (2008-2012) in (US $B)
Figure 9.10: ROW industry revenue trend Vs Unilever PLC (2008-2012) in (US $B)
Figure 9.11: North American market share trend Vs Unilever PLC (2008-2012) in (%)
Figure 9.12: European market share trend Vs Unilever PLC (2008-2012) in (%)
Figure 9.13: APAC market share trend Vs Unilever PLC (2008-2012) in (%)
Figure 9.14: ROW market share trend Vs Unilever PLC (2008-2012) in (%)
Figure 9.15: Unilever PLC trend in R&D expenses 2008-2012 in US $M
Figure 9.16: Unilever PLC trend in R&D expenses percentage of total revenue
Figure 9.17: Comparison of Unilever PLC R&D expenditure Vs top three & top five players average 2011
Figure 9.18: Unilever PLC productivity 2007-2011 in (US $M)
Figure 9.19: Unilever PLC fixed asset value 2007-2011 in (US $M)
Figure 9.20: Strategic execution
List of Tables
Chapter 3. Market Opportunity
Table 3.1: Industry parameters of global hair care product manufacturers industry
Table 3.2: Relative market attractiveness by region
Table 3.3: Regional revenue growth rate
Table 3.3: Segment revenue growth rate
Chapter 4. Competitive Benchmarking (Financial and Market)
Table 4.1: Financial benchmarking of top five global hair care product manufacturers companies
Table 4.2: Key financial parameters for top five hair care product manufacturers companies
Table 4.3: Regional revenue (US $B)
Table 4.4: Regional revenue (%)
Table 4.5: Competitors based on markets served
Table 4.6: Lucintel triad - Top five major players
Chapter 5. Company Profile of Colgate-Palmolive
Table 5.1: Market served: Colgate-Palmolive
Table 5.2: Lucintel triad – Colgate-Palmolive
Table 5.3: Financial Benchmarking of Colgate-Palmolive against best and against Top three and Top five industry players’ average
Table 5.4: Strategic execution – product positioning by segment
Table 5.5: Strategic execution – perceived customer value / quality
Table 5.6: Strategic execution – promotion / communications
Table 5.7: Strategic execution – product distribution by region
Chapter 6. Company Profile of Henkel AG & Co KGaA
Table 6.1: Market served – Henkel AG & Co KGaA
Table 6.2: Lucintel triad – Henkel AG & Co KGaA
Table 6.3: Financial benchmarking of Henkel AG & Co KGaA against best and against Top three and Top five industry players’ average
Table 6.4: Strategic execution – product positioning by segment
Table 6.5: Strategic execution – perceived customer value / quality
Table 6.6: Strategic execution – promotion / communications
Table 6.7: Strategic execution – product distribution by region
Chapter 7. Company Profile of L’Oreal S.A.
Table 7.1: Market served – L’Oreal S.A.
Table 7.2: Lucintel triad – L’Oreal S.A.
Table 7.3: Financial benchmarking of L’Oreal S.A. against best and against Top three and Top five industry players’ average
Table 7.4: Strategic execution – product positioning by segment
Table 7.5: Strategic execution – perceived customer value / quality
Table 7.6: Strategic execution – promotion / communications
Table 7.7: Strategic execution – product distribution by region
Chapter 8. Company Profile of The Procter & Gamble Company
Table 8.1: Market served – The Procter & Gamble Company
Table 8.2: Lucintel triad – The Procter & Gamble Company
Table 8.3: Financial Benchmarking of The Procter & Gamble Company against best and against Top three and top five industry players’ average
Table 8.4: Strategic execution – product positioning by segment
Table 8.5: Strategic execution – perceived customer value / quality
Table 8.6: Strategic execution – promotion / communications
Table 8.7: Strategic execution – product distribution by region
Chapter 9. Company Profile of Unilever PLC
Table 9.1: Markets Served – Unilever PLC
Table 9.2: Lucintel triad – Unilever PLC
Table 9.3: Financial Benchmarking of Unilever PLC against best and against Top three and top five industry players’ average
Table 9.4: Strategic execution – product positioning by segment
Table 9.5: Strategic execution – perceived customer value / quality
Table 9.6: Strategic execution – promotion / communications
Table 9.7: Strategic execution – product distribution by region